These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


169 related items for PubMed ID: 21451165

  • 1. Inferring physical protein contacts from large-scale purification data of protein complexes.
    Schelhorn SE, Mestre J, Albrecht M, Zotenko E.
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2011 Jun; 10(6):M110.004929. PubMed ID: 21451165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Identifying binary protein-protein interactions from affinity purification mass spectrometry data.
    Zhang XF, Ou-Yang L, Hu X, Dai DQ.
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct 05; 16():745. PubMed ID: 26438428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Categorizing biases in high-confidence high-throughput protein-protein interaction data sets.
    Yu X, Ivanic J, Memisević V, Wallqvist A, Reifman J.
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2011 Dec 05; 10(12):M111.012500. PubMed ID: 21876202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality.
    Hart GT, Lee I, Marcotte ER.
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul 02; 8():236. PubMed ID: 17605818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Protein complex prediction via verifying and reconstructing the topology of domain-domain interactions.
    Ozawa Y, Saito R, Fujimori S, Kashima H, Ishizaka M, Yanagawa H, Miyamoto-Sato E, Tomita M.
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun 28; 11():350. PubMed ID: 20584269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Large-scale mapping of human protein interactome using structural complexes.
    Tyagi M, Hashimoto K, Shoemaker BA, Wuchty S, Panchenko AR.
    EMBO Rep; 2012 Mar 01; 13(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 22261719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A novel scoring approach for protein co-purification data reveals high interaction specificity.
    Yu X, Ivanic J, Wallqvist A, Reifman J.
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Sep 01; 5(9):e1000515. PubMed ID: 19779545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Identifying protein complexes in high-throughput protein interaction screens using an infinite latent feature model.
    Chu W, Ghahramani Z, Krause R, Wild DL.
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006 Sep 01; ():231-42. PubMed ID: 17094242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Discover protein complexes in protein-protein interaction networks using parametric local modularity.
    Kim J, Tan K.
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct 19; 11():521. PubMed ID: 20958996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Systematic characterization of the protein interaction network and protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using tandem affinity purification and mass spectrometry.
    Babu M, Krogan NJ, Awrey DE, Emili A, Greenblatt JF.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009 Oct 19; 548():187-207. PubMed ID: 19521826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Popular computational methods to assess multiprotein complexes derived from label-free affinity purification and mass spectrometry (AP-MS) experiments.
    Armean IM, Lilley KS, Trotter MW.
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Jan 19; 12(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 23071097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Predicting physical interactions between protein complexes.
    Clancy T, Rødland EA, Nygard S, Hovig E.
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Jun 19; 12(6):1723-34. PubMed ID: 23438732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.