These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

223 related items for PubMed ID: 21454145

  • 1. Extended PCR conditions to reduce drop-out frequencies in low template STR typing including unequal mixtures.
    Weiler NE, Matai AS, Sijen T.
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21454145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Low template STR typing: effect of replicate number and consensus method on genotyping reliability and DNA database search results.
    Benschop CC, van der Beek CP, Meiland HC, van Gorp AG, Westen AA, Sijen T.
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):316-28. PubMed ID: 20655289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Direct comparison of post-28-cycle PCR purification and modified capillary electrophoresis methods with the 34-cycle "low copy number" (LCN) method for analysis of trace forensic DNA samples.
    Forster L, Thomson J, Kutranov S.
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 19083842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. An investigation of the robustness of the consensus method of interpreting low-template DNA profiles.
    Cowen S, Debenham P, Dixon A, Kutranov S, Thomson J, Way K.
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):400-6. PubMed ID: 20952266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation and comparative analysis of direct amplification of STRs using PowerPlex® 18D and Identifiler® Direct systems.
    Myers BA, King JL, Budowle B.
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Sep; 6(5):640-5. PubMed ID: 22405516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Validation of a male-specific, 12-locus fluorescent short tandem repeat (STR) multiplex.
    Krenke BE, Viculis L, Richard ML, Prinz M, Milne SC, Ladd C, Gross AM, Gornall T, Frappier JR, Eisenberg AJ, Barna C, Aranda XG, Adamowicz MS, Budowle B.
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Feb 10; 148(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15607584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of different interpretation strategies for low template DNA mixtures.
    Pfeifer CM, Klein-Unseld R, Klintschar M, Wiegand P.
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec 10; 6(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 22739132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Stochastic sampling effects in STR typing: Implications for analysis and interpretation.
    Timken MD, Klein SB, Buoncristiani MR.
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jul 10; 11():195-204. PubMed ID: 24799164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Identification of new primer binding site mutations at TH01 and D13S317 loci and determination of their corresponding STR alleles by allele-specific PCR.
    Li F, Xuan J, Xing J, Ding M, Wang B, Pang H.
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan 10; 8(1):143-6. PubMed ID: 24315602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparative performance of AmpFLSTR® Identifiler® Plus PCR amplification kit and QIAGEN® Investigator® IDplex Plus kit.
    Mattayat D, Kitpipit T, Phetpeng S, Asawutmangkul W, Thanakiatkrai P.
    Sci Justice; 2016 Dec 10; 56(6):468-474. PubMed ID: 27914554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.