These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1213 related items for PubMed ID: 21490997

  • 1. Application and effectiveness of a mini-implant- and tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion device: the hybrid hyrax.
    Wilmes B, Nienkemper M, Drescher D.
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21490997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P, Wilmes B, Drescher D, Martin C, Weaver B, Gunel E.
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Hybrid Hyrax Distalizer, a new all-in-one appliance for rapid palatal expansion, early class III treatment and upper molar distalization.
    Wilmes B, Ludwig B, Katyal V, Nienkemper M, Rein A, Drescher D.
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S47-53. PubMed ID: 25138366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The efficacy of maxillary protraction protocols with the micro-implant-assisted rapid palatal expander (MARPE) and the novel N2 mini-implant-a finite element study.
    Moon W, Wu KW, MacGinnis M, Sung J, Chu H, Youssef G, Machado A.
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Sep; 16():16. PubMed ID: 26061987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Three-dimensional prospective evaluation of tooth-borne and bone-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion.
    Nada RM, Fudalej PS, Maal TJ, Bergé SJ, Mostafa YA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):757-62. PubMed ID: 22417772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Application and effectiveness of the Beneslider: a device to move molars distally.
    Wilmes B, Drescher D.
    World J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 11(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 21490998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient.
    Cha BK, Choi DS, Ngan P, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Kim SM, Jang IS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 21195283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Skeletal effects to the maxilla after rapid maxillary expansion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Garrett BJ, Caruso JM, Rungcharassaeng K, Farrage JR, Kim JS, Taylor GD.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 18617096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination.
    Nienkemper M, Wilmes B, Pauls A, Drescher D.
    Prog Orthod; 2013 May 20; 14(1):5. PubMed ID: 24325812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Tooth-borne vs bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders in late adolescence.
    Lin L, Ahn HW, Kim SJ, Moon SC, Kim SH, Nelson G.
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar 20; 85(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 25490552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
    Sar C, Arman-Özçırpıcı A, Uçkan S, Yazıcı AC.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May 20; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Rapid maxillary expansion assisted by palatal mini-implants in adolescents - preliminary study.
    Chane-Fane C, Darqué F.
    Int Orthod; 2015 Mar 20; 13(1):96-111. PubMed ID: 25665914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.
    Liu W, Zhou Y, Wang X, Liu D, Zhou S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct 20; 148(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 26432320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Rapid Maxillary Expansion without Posterior Anchorage.
    Oliveira A, Amaral C.
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016 Oct 20; 27(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 27319047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Treatment effects of a modified palatal anchorage plate for distalization evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kook YA, Bayome M, Trang VT, Kim HJ, Park JH, Kim KB, Behrents RG.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul 20; 146(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 24974998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.
    Hino CT, Cevidanes LH, Nguyen TT, De Clerck HJ, Franchi L, McNamara JA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov 20; 144(5):705-14. PubMed ID: 24182587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of transverse changes during maxillary expansion with 4-point bone-borne and tooth-borne maxillary expanders.
    Mosleh MI, Kaddah MA, Abd ElSayed FA, ElSayed HS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct 20; 148(4):599-607. PubMed ID: 26432315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Early class III facemask treatment with the hybrid hyrax and Alt-RAMEC protocol.
    Wilmes B, Ngan P, Liou EJ, Franchi L, Drescher D.
    J Clin Orthod; 2014 Feb 20; 48(2):84-93. PubMed ID: 24763681
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Bonded versus banded rapid palatal expander followed by facial mask therapy: analysis on digital dental casts.
    Lione R, Huanca Ghislanzoni LT, Defraia E, Franchi L, Cozza P.
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr 20; 38(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 26070923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 61.