These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
490 related items for PubMed ID: 21491004
1. Correction of a severe skeletal Class II occlusion with a fixed functional appliance anchored on mini-implants: a patient report. Gandedkar NH, Revankar AV, Ganeshkar SV. World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):369-79. PubMed ID: 21491004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mini-implants for en masse intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth in a severe Class II division 2 malocclusion. Upadhyay M, Nagaraj K, Yadav S, Saxena R. J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 35(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 18525071 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. En-masse retraction dependent on a temporary skeletal anchorage device without posterior bonding or banding in an adult with severe bidentoalveolar protrusion: seven years posttreatment. Chung KR, Jeong DM, Kim SH, Ko YI, Nelson G. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):484-94. PubMed ID: 22464531 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A segmented appliance for space closure followed by Invisalign and fixed appliances. Uribe F, Cutrera A, Nanda R. Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011 Apr; 12(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 22299111 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Correction of deep overbite and gummy smile by using a mini-implant with a segmented wire in a growing Class II Division 2 patient. Kim TW, Kim H, Lee SJ. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):676-85. PubMed ID: 17110268 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Report of a patient with a Class II occlusion using the Begg technique to move the first molars distally. Uslu O, Erdem D. World J Orthod; 2009 Nov; 10(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 19885429 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of mini-implants in Class II division 1 patients. Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Nagaraj K, Nanda R. Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 19216590 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An esthetic treatment outcome of orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in class II treatment: a cephalometric study. Kabbur KJ, Hemanth M, Patil GS, Sathyadeep V, Shamnur N, Harieesha KB, Praveen GR. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep 01; 13(5):602-6. PubMed ID: 23250160 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Anchorage loss due to Herbst mechanics-preventable through miniscrews? Bremen Jv, Ludwig B, Ruf S. Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct 01; 37(5):462-6. PubMed ID: 25452627 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Orthopedic treatment of dento-skeletal Class II by the association minivis + Forsus(TM): a clinical case]. Pujol P. Orthod Fr; 2014 Jun 01; 85(2):201-15. PubMed ID: 24923219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Yao CC, Lai EH, Chang JZ, Chen I, Chen YJ. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov 01; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]