These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

170 related items for PubMed ID: 21495059

  • 1. Bias in estimating accuracy of a binary screening test with differential disease verification.
    Alonzo TA, Brinton JT, Ringham BM, Glueck DH.
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul 10; 30(15):1852-64. PubMed ID: 21495059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic or screening test accuracy when the reference standard is imperfect.
    Walter SD, Macaskill P, Lord SJ, Irwig L.
    Stat Med; 2012 May 20; 31(11-12):1129-38. PubMed ID: 22351623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity can be biased when reporting the results of the second test in a screening trial conducted in series.
    Ringham BM, Alonzo TA, Grunwald GK, Glueck DH.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jan 11; 10():3. PubMed ID: 20064254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Bias in trials comparing paired continuous tests can cause researchers to choose the wrong screening modality.
    Glueck DH, Lamb MM, O'Donnell CI, Ringham BM, Brinton JT, Muller KE, Lewin JM, Alonzo TA, Pisano ED.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jan 20; 9():4. PubMed ID: 19154609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reducing decision errors in the paired comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests with Gaussian outcomes.
    Ringham BM, Alonzo TA, Brinton JT, Kreidler SM, Munjal A, Muller KE, Glueck DH.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Mar 05; 14():37. PubMed ID: 24597517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review.
    Biesheuvel C, Barratt A, Howard K, Houssami N, Irwig L.
    Lancet Oncol; 2007 Dec 05; 8(12):1129-1138. PubMed ID: 18054882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.
    Islam N, Salameh JP, Leeflang MM, Hooft L, McGrath TA, van der Pol CB, Frank RA, Kazi S, Prager R, Hare SS, Dennie C, Spijker R, Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, Jenniskens K, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, Van den Bruel A, Takwoingi Y, van de Wijgert J, Wang J, McInnes MD, Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy GroupNIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK..
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Nov 26; 11():CD013639. PubMed ID: 33242342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.
    Alonzo TA.
    Stat Med; 2005 Feb 15; 24(3):403-17. PubMed ID: 15543634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Factors associated with imaging and procedural events used to detect breast cancer after screening mammography.
    Carney PA, Abraham LA, Miglioretti DL, Yabroff KR, Sickles EA, Buist DS, Kasales CJ, Geller BM, Rosenberg RD, Dignan MB, Weaver DL, Kerlikowske K, Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb 15; 188(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 17242246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Verification bias an underrecognized source of error in assessing the efficacy of medical imaging.
    Petscavage JM, Richardson ML, Carr RB.
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Mar 15; 18(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 21145764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Design-related bias in estimates of accuracy when comparing imaging tests: examples from breast imaging research.
    Houssami N, Ciatto S.
    Eur Radiol; 2010 Sep 15; 20(9):2061-6. PubMed ID: 20393716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.