These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

945 related items for PubMed ID: 21495062

  • 21. Hierarchical priors for bias parameters in Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding.
    McCandless LC, Gustafson P, Levy AR, Richardson S.
    Stat Med; 2012 Feb 20; 31(4):383-96. PubMed ID: 22253142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. What random assignment does and does not do.
    Krause MS, Howard KI.
    J Clin Psychol; 2003 Jul 20; 59(7):751-66. PubMed ID: 12808582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Comparison of the risk difference, risk ratio and odds ratio scales for quantifying the unadjusted intervention effect in cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC, Forbes AB, Carlin JB, Gulliford MC.
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov 10; 27(25):5143-55. PubMed ID: 18613226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studies.
    Harbord RM, Didelez V, Palmer TM, Meng S, Sterne JA, Sheehan NA.
    Stat Med; 2013 Mar 30; 32(7):1246-58. PubMed ID: 23080538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Performance of statistical methods for analysing survival data in the presence of non-random compliance.
    Odondi L, McNamee R.
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec 20; 29(29):2994-3003. PubMed ID: 20963732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Evidence from nonrandomized studies: a case study on the estimation of causal effects.
    Schmoor C, Caputo A, Schumacher M.
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 May 01; 167(9):1120-9. PubMed ID: 18334500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S, Graf E, Schmoor C, Schumacher M.
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar 30; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Instrumental variable estimation of the causal hazard ratio.
    Wang L, Tchetgen Tchetgen E, Martinussen T, Vansteelandt S.
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun 30; 79(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 36377509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Estimating adjusted NNTs in randomised controlled trials with binary outcomes: a simulation study.
    Bender R, Vervölgyi V.
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Sep 30; 31(5):498-505. PubMed ID: 20624484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A comparison of methods to estimate the survivor average causal effect in the presence of missing data: a simulation study.
    McGuinness MB, Kasza J, Karahalios A, Guymer RH, Finger RP, Simpson JA.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec 03; 19(1):223. PubMed ID: 31795945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 48.