These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

220 related items for PubMed ID: 21508534

  • 1. Adsorption and removal at low atrazine concentration in an MBR pilot plant.
    Buttiglieri G, Migliorisi L, Malpei F.
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(7):1334-40. PubMed ID: 21508534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
    Radjenović J, Petrović M, Barceló D.
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cost effective and advanced phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors for a decentralised wastewater technology.
    Gnirss R, Lesjean B, Adam C, Buisson H.
    Water Sci Technol; 2003 Feb; 47(12):133-9. PubMed ID: 12926680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS, Dhagat NN.
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Modelling of long-term simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SNDN) performance of a pilot scale membrane bioreactor.
    Sarioglu M, Insel G, Artan N, Orhon D.
    Water Sci Technol; 2008 Apr; 57(11):1825-33. PubMed ID: 18547937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates removal in conventional activated sludge systems and membrane bioreactors.
    De Wever H, Van Roy S, Dotremont C, Miller J, Knepper T.
    Water Sci Technol; 2004 Apr; 50(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 15497851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Performances of a hybrid adsorption/submerged membrane biological process for toxic waste removal.
    Lesage N, Spérandio M, Cabassud C.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Apr; 51(6-7):173-80. PubMed ID: 16003976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Bioaugmentation treatment of atrazine in MBR using genetically engineered microorganism (GEM)].
    Liu C, Huang X, Sun W, Wang H.
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2007 Feb; 28(2):417-21. PubMed ID: 17489209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment.
    González S, Petrovic M, Barceló D.
    Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 17123581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biodegradation kinetic constants and sorption coefficients of micropollutants in membrane bioreactors.
    Fernandez-Fontaina E, Pinho I, Carballa M, Omil F, Lema JM.
    Biodegradation; 2013 Apr; 24(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 22773131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment.
    De Wever H, Weiss S, Reemtsma T, Vereecken J, Müller J, Knepper T, Rörden O, Gonzalez S, Barcelo D, Dolores Hernando M.
    Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(4):935-45. PubMed ID: 17207834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Anaerobic treatment of atrazine bearing wastewater.
    Ghosh PK, Philip L, Bandyopadhyay M.
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2001 May; 36(3):301-16. PubMed ID: 11411853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater.
    Munz G, Gualtiero M, Salvadori L, Claudia B, Claudio L.
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8559-64. PubMed ID: 18499451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Membrane bio-reactor for textile wastewater treatment plant upgrading.
    Lubello C, Gori R.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Dec; 52(4):91-8. PubMed ID: 16235750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Membrane bioreactors for final treatment of wastewater.
    Galil NI, Sheindorf Ch, Stahl N, Tenenbaum A, Levinsky Y.
    Water Sci Technol; 2003 Dec; 48(8):103-10. PubMed ID: 14682576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Indigenous somatic coliphage removal from a real municipal wastewater by a submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Wu J, Li H, Huang X.
    Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1853-62. PubMed ID: 20045169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effluent quality of a conventional activated sludge and a membrane bioreactor system treating hospital wastewater.
    Pauwels B, Fru Ngwa F, Deconinck S, Verstraete W.
    Environ Technol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 16583824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of the removal of phthalates and other organic pollutants from industrial wastewaters in membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment plants.
    Llop A, Borrull F, Pocurull E.
    Water Sci Technol; 2009 Apr; 60(9):2425-37. PubMed ID: 19901476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.