These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

125 related items for PubMed ID: 21518376

  • 1. Human enhancement and sexual dimorphism.
    Sparrow R.
    Bioethics; 2012 Nov; 26(9):464-75. PubMed ID: 21518376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Should human beings have sex? Sexual dimorphism and human enhancement.
    Sparrow R.
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):3-12. PubMed ID: 20582815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Better than men? Sex and the therapy/enhancement distinction.
    Sparrow R.
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2010 Jun; 20(2):115-44. PubMed ID: 20653249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Ending parents' unlimited power to choose: legislation is necessary to prohibit parents' selection of their children's sex and characteristics.
    Plummer KM.
    St Louis Univ Law J; 2003 Jun; 47(2):517-60. PubMed ID: 15478260
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. 'My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm': an argument against moral enhancement.
    Tonkens R.
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Mar; 41(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 24748649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Why bioethicists still need to think more about sex ..
    Sparrow R.
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul; 10(7):W1-3. PubMed ID: 20582814
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A not-so-new eugenics. Harris and Savulescu on human enhancement.
    Sparrow R.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2011 Jul; 41(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 21329104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The post-humanist embryo: genetic manipulation, assisted reproductive technologies and the Principle of Procreative Beneficence.
    Güell Pelayo F.
    Cuad Bioet; 2014 Jul; 25(85):427-43. PubMed ID: 25684382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The search for perfection.
    Harris J, Shakespeare T, Phillips K, Bruce D.
    New Sci; 2002 May 11; 174(2342):52-4. PubMed ID: 12408144
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Behavioural genetics: why eugenic selection is preferable to enhancement.
    Savulescu J, Hemsley M, Newson A, Foddy B.
    J Appl Philos; 2006 May 11; 23(2):157-71. PubMed ID: 17036429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Appropriate aims: setting boundaries for reprogenetic technology.
    Ziker D.
    Duke Law Technol Rev; 2002 Jul 17; ():E1. PubMed ID: 15709285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan.
    DeGrazia D.
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Mar 17; 38(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 22074771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Imagining human enhancement: whose future, which rationality?
    Tomasini F.
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2007 Mar 17; 28(6):497-507. PubMed ID: 18322820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Medical ethics and reproductive genetics in Swedish public discourse.
    Dekker C.
    Biomed Ethics; 2000 Mar 17; 5(3):100-5. PubMed ID: 12755111
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The risks of "sexual normalcy".
    Green RM.
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jul 17; 10(7):13-4. PubMed ID: 20582818
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.