These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
439 related items for PubMed ID: 21529811
1. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty. Higa M, Tanino H, Abo M, Kakunai S, Banks SA. J Biomech; 2011 Jun 03; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation. Seki M, Yuasa N, Ohkuni K. J Orthop Res; 1998 Jul 03; 16(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 9747795 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach. Kessler O, Patil S, Wirth S, Mayr E, Colwell CW, D'Lima DD. J Orthop Res; 2008 Apr 03; 26(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 18050356 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. D'Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell CW. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar 03; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A computer model of the position of the combined component in the prevention of impingement in total hip replacement. Barsoum WK, Patterson RW, Higuera C, Klika AK, Krebs VE, Molloy R. J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jun 03; 89(6):839-45. PubMed ID: 17613516 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Modular neck for prevention of prosthetic impingement in cases with excessively anteverted femur. Miki H, Sugano N. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2011 Nov 03; 26(9):944-9. PubMed ID: 21680069 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion]. Sendtner E, Müller M, Winkler R, Wörner M, Grifka J, Renkawitz T. Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar 03; 148(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20376760 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Widmer KH, Majewski M. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Aug 03; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A three-dimensional parameterized and visually kinematic simulation module for the theoretical range of motion of total hip arthroplasty. Ji WT, Tao K, Wang CT. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2010 Jun 03; 25(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 20189695 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty. Ohmori T, Kabata T, Kajino Y, Taga T, Hasegawa K, Inoue D, Yamamoto T, Takagi T, Yoshitani J, Ueno T, Tsuchiya H. Int Orthop; 2018 May 03; 42(5):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 28990125 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul 03; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. Yoshimine F. J Biomech; 2006 Dec 03; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]