These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

209 related items for PubMed ID: 21531075

  • 21. Immobilization of U(VI) from oxic groundwater by Hanford 300 Area sediments and effects of Columbia River water.
    Ahmed B, Cao B, Mishra B, Boyanov MI, Kemner KM, Fredrickson JK, Beyenal H.
    Water Res; 2012 Sep 01; 46(13):3989-98. PubMed ID: 22683408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Sequestering uranium and technetium through co-precipitation with aluminum in a contaminated acidic environment.
    Luo W, Kelly SD, Kemner KM, Watson D, Zhou J, Jardine PM, Gu B.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Oct 01; 43(19):7516-22. PubMed ID: 19848170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The role of sediment properties and solution pH in the adsorption of uranium(VI) to freshwater sediments.
    Crawford SE, Lofts S, Liber K.
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Jan 01; 220(Pt B):873-881. PubMed ID: 27825841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Geochemical modeling of reactions and partitioning of trace metals and radionuclides during titration of contaminated acidic sediments.
    Zhang F, Luo W, Parker JC, Spalding BP, Brooks SC, Watson DB, Jardine PM, Gu B.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Nov 01; 42(21):8007-13. PubMed ID: 19031894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Variably saturated flow and multicomponent biogeochemical reactive transport modeling of a uranium bioremediation field experiment.
    Yabusaki SB, Fang Y, Williams KH, Murray CJ, Ward AL, Dayvault RD, Waichler SR, Newcomer DR, Spane FA, Long PE.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2011 Nov 01; 126(3-4):271-90. PubMed ID: 22115092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Phosphate-Induced Immobilization of Uranium in Hanford Sediments.
    Pan Z, Giammar DE, Mehta V, Troyer LD, Catalano JG, Wang Z.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Dec 20; 50(24):13486-13494. PubMed ID: 27993066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Kinetics of uranium(VI) desorption from contaminated sediments: effect of geochemical conditions and model evaluation.
    Liu C, Shi Z, Zachara JM.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Sep 01; 43(17):6560-6. PubMed ID: 19764217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Conceptual and numerical model of uranium(VI) reductive immobilization in fractured subsurface sediments.
    Roden EE, Scheibe TD.
    Chemosphere; 2005 Apr 01; 59(5):617-28. PubMed ID: 15792659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Efficient removal of uranium from aqueous solution by zero-valent iron nanoparticle and its graphene composite.
    Li ZJ, Wang L, Yuan LY, Xiao CL, Mei L, Zheng LR, Zhang J, Yang JH, Zhao YL, Zhu ZT, Chai ZF, Shi WQ.
    J Hazard Mater; 2015 Jun 15; 290():26-33. PubMed ID: 25734531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Influence of calcite on uranium(VI) reactive transport in the groundwater-river mixing zone.
    Ma R, Liu C, Greskowiak J, Prommer H, Zachara J, Zheng C.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Jan 15; 156():27-37. PubMed ID: 24240103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Study of uranium(VI) and radium(II) sorption at trace level on kaolinite using a multisite ion exchange model.
    Reinoso-Maset E, Ly J.
    J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jun 15; 157():136-48. PubMed ID: 27077702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Stochastic simulation of uranium migration at the Hanford 300 Area.
    Hammond GE, Lichtner PC, Rockhold ML.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2011 Mar 01; 120-121():115-28. PubMed ID: 20510479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Uncertainty and variability in laboratory derived sorption parameters of sediments from a uranium in situ recovery site.
    Dangelmayr MA, Reimus PW, Johnson RH, Clay JT, Stone JJ.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Jun 01; 213():28-39. PubMed ID: 29691066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Methods for estimating adsorbed uranium(VI) and distribution coefficients of contaminated sediments.
    Kohler M, Curtis GP, Meece DE, Davis JA.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Jan 01; 38(1):240-7. PubMed ID: 14740742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Manganese and trace-metal mobility under reducing conditions following in situ oxidation of TCE by KMnO4: a laboratory column experiment.
    Loomer DB, Al TA, Banks VJ, Parker BL, Mayer KU.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2011 Jan 25; 119(1-4):13-24. PubMed ID: 20889229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Transport of U(VI) through sediments amended with phosphate to induce in situ uranium immobilization.
    Mehta VS, Maillot F, Wang Z, Catalano JG, Giammar DE.
    Water Res; 2015 Feb 01; 69():307-317. PubMed ID: 25497429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Cesium migration in Hanford sediment: a multisite cation exchange model based on laboratory transport experiments.
    Steefel CI, Carroll S, Zhao P, Roberts S.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Dec 01; 67(1-4):219-46. PubMed ID: 14607478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Large-scale modeling of reactive solute transport in fracture zones of granitic bedrocks.
    Molinero J, Samper J.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jan 10; 82(3-4):293-318. PubMed ID: 16337025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Ni adsorption and Ni-Al LDH precipitation in a sandy aquifer: an experimental and mechanistic modeling study.
    Regelink IC, Temminghoff EJ.
    Environ Pollut; 2011 Mar 10; 159(3):716-21. PubMed ID: 21186070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. An Assessment of U(VI) removal from groundwater using biochar produced from hydrothermal carbonization.
    Kumar S, Loganathan VA, Gupta RB, Barnett MO.
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct 10; 92(10):2504-12. PubMed ID: 21665352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.