These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

187 related items for PubMed ID: 21558947

  • 1. Photoelastic analysis of implant-retained and conventional obturator prostheses with different attachment systems and soft relining.
    do Prado Ribeiro P, Goiato MC, Pellizzer EP, Pesqueira AA, Haddad MF, de Carvalho Dekon SF, dos Santos DM.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 May; 22(3):797-800. PubMed ID: 21558947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Photoelastic stress analysis of different attachment systems on implant-retained and conventional palatal obturator prostheses.
    do Prado Ribeiro P, Goiato MC, Pellizzer EP, Pesqueira AA, Haddad MF, Alves-Rezende MC, dos Santos DM.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):523-6. PubMed ID: 21403545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
    Barão VA, Assunção WG, Tabata LF, Delben JA, Gomes EA, de Sousa EA, Rocha EP.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Photoelastic analysis to compare implant-retained and conventional obturator dentures.
    Goiato MC, Ribeiro Pdo P, Pellizzer EP, Pesqueira AA, Haddad MF, dos Santos DM, Moreno A.
    J Biomed Opt; 2012 Jun; 17(6):061203. PubMed ID: 22734733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A photoelastic and strain gauge comparison of two attachments for obturator prostheses.
    Goiato MC, Matheus HR, de Medeiros RA, Dos Santos DM, Bitencourt SB, Pesqueira AA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):685-689. PubMed ID: 27881311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses, part II: photoelastic imaging.
    Pesqueira AA, Goiato MC, da Silva EV, Haddad MF, Moreno A, Zahoui A, dos Santos DM.
    J Biomed Opt; 2014 Jun; 19(6):066012. PubMed ID: 24972360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses: imaging photoelastic.
    Pesqueira AA, Goiato MC, dos Santos DM, Haddad MF, Andreotti AM, Moreno A.
    J Biomed Opt; 2013 Jun; 18(6):061203. PubMed ID: 23143194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G, Uludag B.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Photoelastic analysis of biomechanical behavior of single and multiple fixed partial prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
    Tonella BP, Pellizzer EP, Falcón-Antenucci RM, Ferraço R, de Faria Almeida DA.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2060-3. PubMed ID: 22067856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses over parallel and tilted implants: photoelastic imaging.
    Pesqueira AA, Goiato MC, dos Santos DM, Nobrega AS, Haddad MF, Andreotti AM, Moreno A.
    J Biomed Opt; 2013 Oct; 18(10):106009. PubMed ID: 24129983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Photoelastic analysis of cemented or screwed implant-supported prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
    Tonella BP, Pellizzer EP, Ferraço R, Falcón-Antenucci RM, Carvalho PS, Goiato MC.
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 21851260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Impact of dental and zygomatic implants on stress distribution in maxillary defects: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Korkmaz FM, Korkmaz YT, Yaluğ S, Korkmaz T.
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):557-67. PubMed ID: 20925533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
    Ochiai KT, Williams BH, Hojo S, Nishimura R, Caputo AA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Magnet-retained facial prosthesis combined with an implant-supported edentulous maxillary obturator: a case report.
    Takahashi T, Fukuda M, Funaki K, Tanaka K.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 May; 21(5):805-7. PubMed ID: 17066645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution of implant-retained overdentures-2D FEA.
    Barão VA, Assunção WG, Tabata LF, de Sousa EA, Rocha EP.
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Nov; 92(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 18783845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF, Assunção WG, Barão VA, Gomes EA, Delben JA, de Sousa EA, Rocha EP.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 20485031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of different retention systems on a distal extension removable partial denture associated with an osseointegrated implant.
    Pellizzer EP, Verri FR, Falcón-Antenucci RM, Goiato MC, Gennari Filho H.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):727-34. PubMed ID: 20485037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.