These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

120 related items for PubMed ID: 21560667

  • 1. Placing posterior composites: increasing efficiency.
    Jackon RD.
    Dent Today; 2011 Apr; 30(4):126, 128, 130-1. PubMed ID: 21560667
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A placement technique for creating ideal contours and aesthetics for adjacent multisurface posterior composites.
    Hosner JD.
    Dent Today; 2005 May; 24(5):84-9; quiz 89, 65. PubMed ID: 15957636
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Posterior composites revisited.
    Ritter AV.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008 May; 20(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 18237342
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Composite resin-amalgam compound restorations.
    Franchi M, Trisi P, Montanari G, Piattelli A.
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):577-82. PubMed ID: 7568708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical and SEM study of Tetric resin composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results.
    Krejci I, Besek M, Lutz F.
    Am J Dent; 1994 Feb; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 9115675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Predictable contacts with composite resins.
    Abel MG.
    Dent Today; 2004 Apr; 23(4):72-4, 76-7. PubMed ID: 15112520
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A prescription for the successful use of heavy filled composites in the posterior dentition.
    Davidson DF, Suzuki M.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1999 May; 65(5):256-60. PubMed ID: 10380400
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Contemporary restoration of Class II caries. Direct posterior composites.
    Abel MG.
    Dent Today; 2002 Nov; 21(11):94-7. PubMed ID: 12483933
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Patient demand is increasing for posterior aesthetics.
    Nash RW.
    Dent Today; 2010 May; 29(5):74, 76, 78-9. PubMed ID: 20506913
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Posterior direct composites: clinical protocol.
    Javaheri DS.
    Dent Today; 2007 Mar; 26(3):94, 96-7. PubMed ID: 17441518
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of marginal adaptation between direct and indirect composites.
    Reeves GW, Lentz DL, O'Hara JW, McDaniel MD, Tolbert WE.
    Oper Dent; 1992 Mar; 17(6):210-4. PubMed ID: 1303513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV, Wilson NH.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Eliminating microleakage from the composite resin system.
    Estafan D, Agosta C.
    Gen Dent; 2003 May; 51(6):506-9. PubMed ID: 15055646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.