These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
111 related items for PubMed ID: 21560843
1. Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy in prognostic surgical outcome. Chiewvit P, Tritrakarn SO, Phawjinda A, Chotivichit A. J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Mar; 94(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 21560843 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic evaluation of the spinal cord in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy using a kinematic magnetic resonance imaging technique. Miura J, Doita M, Miyata K, Marui T, Nishida K, Fujii M, Kurosaka M. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Feb; 22(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 19190428 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical and MRI predictors of outcome after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Alafifi T, Kern R, Fehlings M. J Neuroimaging; 2007 Oct; 17(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 17894620 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance T2 image signal intensity ratio and clinical manifestation predict prognosis after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Zhang YZ, Shen Y, Wang LF, Ding WY, Xu JX, He J. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May 01; 35(10):E396-9. PubMed ID: 20393392 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic value of somatosensory-evoked potentials in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Hu Y, Ding Y, Ruan D, Wong YW, Cheung KM, Luk KD. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May 01; 33(10):E305-10. PubMed ID: 18449030 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of prognostic value of different MRI classifications of signal intensity change in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Avadhani A, Rajasekaran S, Shetty AP. Spine J; 2010 Jun 01; 10(6):475-85. PubMed ID: 20494809 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome. Houten JK, Cooper PR. Neurosurgery; 2003 May 01; 52(5):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 12699550 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Relationship of dynamic cord impingement with disease severity and prognosis in cervical spondylotic myelopathy]. Wang LF, Shen Y, Zhang YZ, Xu JX, Ding WY, Cao JM. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Nov 10; 89(41):2883-7. PubMed ID: 20137642 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes following cervical laminoplasty for 19 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Kaner T, Sasani M, Oktenoğlu T, Ozer AF. Turk Neurosurg; 2009 Apr 10; 19(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 19431120 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improve the Predictive Performance of a Validated Clinical Prediction Rule Developed to Evaluate Surgical Outcome in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy? Nouri A, Tetreault L, Côté P, Zamorano JJ, Dalzell K, Fehlings MG. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul 15; 40(14):1092-100. PubMed ID: 25893357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty. Shiraishi T, Fukuda K, Yato Y, Nakamura M, Ikegami T. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Dec 15; 28(24):2667-72. PubMed ID: 14673367 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation and treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by subtotal corporectomy without grafting]. Born JD. Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg; 2000 Dec 15; 155(3-4):171-9; discussion 179-82. PubMed ID: 11143790 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic changes in dural sac and spinal cord cross-sectional area in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: cervical spine. Machino M, Yukawa Y, Ito K, Nakashima H, Kato F. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Mar 01; 36(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 20890264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Approaches to spondylotic cervical myelopathy: conservative versus surgical results in a 3-year follow-up study. Kadanka Z, Mares M, Bednaník J, Smrcka V, Krbec M, Stejskal L, Chaloupka R, Surelová D, Novotný O, Urbánek I, Dusek L. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Oct 15; 27(20):2205-10; discussion 2210-1. PubMed ID: 12394893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]