These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
784 related items for PubMed ID: 21565744
1. Cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography and cardiac stress imaging in the emergency department: a decision analytic model comparing diagnostic strategies for chest pain in patients at low risk of acute coronary syndromes. Priest VL, Scuffham PA, Hachamovitch R, Marwick TH. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 May; 4(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 21565744 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term Cost-Effectiveness of Diagnostic Tests for Assessing Stable Chest Pain: Modeled Analysis of Anatomical and Functional Strategies. Bertoldi EG, Stella SF, Rohde LE, Polanczyk CA. Clin Cardiol; 2016 May; 39(5):249-56. PubMed ID: 27080921 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Combined stress myocardial CT perfusion and coronary CT angiography as a feasible strategy among patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department. Grandhi GR, Batlle JC, Maroules CD, Janowitz W, Peña CS, Ziffer JA, Macedo R, Nasir K, Cury RC. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2021 May; 15(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 32807703 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sixty-four-slice computed tomography of the coronary arteries: cost-effectiveness analysis of patients presenting to the emergency department with low-risk chest pain. Khare RK, Courtney DM, Powell ES, Venkatesh AK, Lee TA. Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Jul; 15(7):623-32. PubMed ID: 19086322 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Potential cost effectiveness of initial myocardial perfusion imaging for assessment of emergency department patients with chest pain. Radensky PW, Hilton TC, Fulmer H, McLaughlin BA, Stowers SA. Am J Cardiol; 1997 Mar 01; 79(5):595-9. PubMed ID: 9068515 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography in patients with chest pain: Comparison with myocardial single photon emission tomography. Lee SP, Jang EJ, Kim YJ, Cha MJ, Park SY, Song HJ, Choi JE, Shim JI, Ahn J, Lee HJ. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015 Mar 01; 9(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 25977116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of a novel blood-pool contrast agent in the setting of chest pain evaluation in an emergency department. Espinosa G, Annapragada A. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct 01; 201(4):710-9. PubMed ID: 24059359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of a novel indication of computed tomography of the coronary arteries. Powell ES, Patterson BW, Venkatesh AK, Khare RK. Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2012 Mar 01; 11(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22337217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography in patients with suspicion for acute coronary syndrome. Goehler A, Mayrhofer T, Pursnani A, Ferencik M, Lumish HS, Barth C, Karády J, Chow B, Truong QA, Udelson JE, Fleg JL, Nagurney JT, Gazelle GS, Hoffmann U. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020 Mar 01; 14(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 31303580 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing Evaluation of Patients with Low-to-Intermediate-Risk Acute Chest Pain: A Randomized Study Comparing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Tomography Incorporating Stress-Only Imaging Versus Cardiac CT. Nabi F, Kassi M, Muhyieddeen K, Chang SM, Xu J, Peterson LE, Wray NP, Shirkey BA, Ashton CM, Mahmarian JJ. J Nucl Med; 2016 Mar 01; 57(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 26635341 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction. Mowatt G, Vale L, Brazzelli M, Hernandez R, Murray A, Scott N, Fraser C, McKenzie L, Gemmell H, Hillis G, Metcalfe M. Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jul 01; 8(30):iii-iv, 1-207. PubMed ID: 15248938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A time and imaging cost analysis of low-risk ED observation patients: a conservative 64-section computed tomography coronary angiography "triple rule-out" compared to nuclear stress test strategy. Takakuwa KM, Halpern EJ, Shofer FS. Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Feb 01; 29(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 20825785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Coronary computed tomography angiography vs. myocardial single photon emission computed tomography in patients with intermediate risk chest pain: a randomized clinical trial for cost-effectiveness comparison based on real-world cost. Lee SP, Seo JK, Hwang IC, Park JB, Park EA, Lee W, Paeng JC, Lee HJ, Yoon YE, Kim HL, Koh E, Choi I, Choi JE, Kim YJ. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr 01; 20(4):417-425. PubMed ID: 30052964 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial. Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Hayes SW, Hoffmann U, Lesser JR, Mikati IA, O'Neil BJ, Shaw LJ, Shen MY, Valeti US, Raff GL, CT-STAT Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Sep 27; 58(14):1414-22. PubMed ID: 21939822 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]