These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
248 related items for PubMed ID: 21568782
1. Endoscopic versus open radial artery harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting. Navia JL, Brozzi N, Chiu J, Blackstone EH, Hanson GL, Al-Ruzzeh S, Lytle BW. Scand Cardiovasc J; 2011 Oct; 45(5):279-85. PubMed ID: 21568782 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Neurologic sequelae of the donor arm after endoscopic versus conventional radial artery harvesting. Bleiziffer S, Hettich I, Eisenhauer B, Ruzicka D, Voss B, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Sep; 136(3):681-7. PubMed ID: 18805272 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting is better than the open technique. Patel AN, Henry AC, Hunnicutt C, Cockerham CA, Willey B, Urschel HC. Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jul; 78(1):149-53; discussion 149-53. PubMed ID: 15223420 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Endoscopic vein-graft harvesting for coronary bypass grafting: good results in patients at risk for surgical site infection]. Ikram MU, Li WW, Segers P, Kloek JJ, de Mol BA. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010 Jul; 154():A1806. PubMed ID: 20858296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: the initial clinical experience and results of the first 50 patients. Ito N, Tashiro T, Morishige N, Iwahashi H, Nishimi M, Hayashida Y, Takeuchi K, Minematsu N, Kuwahara G, Sukehiro Y. Heart Surg Forum; 2009 Dec; 12(6):E310-5. PubMed ID: 20037095 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Persistent sensitivity disorders at the radial artery and saphenous vein graft harvest sites: a neglected side effect of coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. Dick F, Hristic A, Roost-Krähenbühl E, Aymard T, Weber A, Tevaearai HT, Carrel TP. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 21177115 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Postoperative and midterm outcomes of minimally invasive and endoscopic great saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting - a prospective analysis. Simek M, Nemec P, Bruk V, Gwozdziewicz M, Fluger I, Langova K. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Oct; 55(7):428-32. PubMed ID: 17902064 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Five-Year Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Versus Open Radial Artery Harvesting: A Propensity Score Analysis. Bisleri G, Giroletti L, Hrapkowicz T, Bertuletti M, Zembala M, Arieti M, Muneretto C. Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Oct; 102(4):1253-9. PubMed ID: 27318774 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates. Yun KL, Wu Y, Aharonian V, Mansukhani P, Pfeffer TA, Sintek CF, Kochamba GS, Grunkemeier G, Khonsari S. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 129(3):496-503. PubMed ID: 15746730 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk factors for leg wound complications following endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting. Allen KB, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Schier JJ, Griffith GL, Fitzgerald EB, Isch JH, Abraham S, Shaar CJ. Heart Surg Forum; 2000 Mar; 3(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 11178296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Endoscopic radial artery harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: applications and histologic assessment]. Zhao S, Yuan B, Zhu XL, Zhao Z, Li DH, Zhang YY. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Apr 15; 47(8):580-2. PubMed ID: 19595035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest techniques on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ouzounian M, Hassan A, Buth KJ, MacPherson C, Ali IM, Hirsch GM, Ali IS. Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb 15; 89(2):403-8. PubMed ID: 20103309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting: our initial experience and results of the first 25 patients. Yoshizaki T, Arai H, Igari T, Tabuchi N, Tanaka H, Sunamori M. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Dec 15; 11(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 16401988 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic versus conventional radial artery harvest--is smaller better? Shapira OM, Eskenazi BR, Hunter CT, Anter E, Bao Y, Murphy R, Lazar HL, Shemin RJ. J Card Surg; 2006 Dec 15; 21(4):329-35. PubMed ID: 16846408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrospective analysis of local sensorimotor deficits after radial artery harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting. Shah SA, Chark D, Williams J, Hessheimer A, Huh J, Wu YC, Chang PA, Scholl FG, Drinkwater DC. J Surg Res; 2007 May 15; 139(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 17292405 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic versus conventional radial artery harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: functional and histologic assessment of the conduit. Shapira OM, Eskenazi BR, Anter E, Joseph L, Christensen TG, Hunter CT, Lazar HL, Vita JA, Shemin RJ, Keaney JF. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Feb 15; 131(2):388-94. PubMed ID: 16434269 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Patency rates of endoscopically harvested radial arteries one year after coronary artery bypass grafting. Bleiziffer S, Hettich I, Eisenhauer B, Ruzicka D, Wottke M, Hausleiter J, Martinoff S, Morgenstern M, Lange R. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Sep 15; 134(3):649-56. PubMed ID: 17723813 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic versus direct vision for saphenous vein graft harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery. Ad N, Henry L, Hunt S, Holmes S, Burton N, Massimiano P, Rhee J, Rongione A, Speir A, Collazo L. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2011 Oct 15; 52(5):739-48. PubMed ID: 21894141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]