These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

286 related items for PubMed ID: 21570778

  • 1. Prostate needle biopsy examination by means of virtual microscopy.
    Chargari C, Comperat E, Magné N, Védrine L, Houlgatte A, Egevad L, Camparo P.
    Pathol Res Pract; 2011 Jun 15; 207(6):366-9. PubMed ID: 21570778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
    Sebo TJ, Bock BJ, Cheville JC, Lohse C, Wollan P, Zincke H.
    J Urol; 2000 Jan 15; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
    Divrik RT, Eroglu A, Sahin A, Zorlu F, Ozen H.
    Urol Oncol; 2007 Jan 15; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Poulos CK, Daggy JK, Cheng L.
    Cancer; 2004 Aug 01; 101(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 15274065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
    Makarov DV, Sanderson H, Partin AW, Epstein JI.
    J Urol; 2002 Jun 01; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Should intervening benign tissue be included in the measurement of discontinuous foci of cancer on prostate needle biopsy? Correlation with radical prostatectomy findings.
    Karram S, Trock BJ, Netto GJ, Epstein JI.
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Sep 01; 35(9):1351-5. PubMed ID: 21836493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
    King CR, McNeal JE, Gill H, Presti JC.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun 01; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score.
    Fine SW, Epstein JI.
    J Urol; 2008 Apr 01; 179(4):1335-8; discussion 1338-9. PubMed ID: 18289601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The value of mandatory second opinion pathology review of prostate needle biopsy interpretation before radical prostatectomy.
    Brimo F, Schultz L, Epstein JI.
    J Urol; 2010 Jul 01; 184(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 20478583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study.
    Kvåle R, Møller B, Wahlqvist R, Fosså SD, Berner A, Busch C, Kyrdalen AE, Svindland A, Viset T, Halvorsen OJ.
    BJU Int; 2009 Jun 01; 103(12):1647-54. PubMed ID: 19154461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively?
    Rubin MA, Mucci NR, Manley S, Sanda M, Cushenberry E, Strawderman M, Montie JE, Bassily NH.
    J Urol; 2001 Jan 01; 165(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 11125378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Conventional assessment of needle biopsy specimens is more useful than digital image analysis of proliferation and DNA ploidy in prediction of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy.
    Sengupta S, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H, Myers RP, Riehle DL, Pankratz VS, Blute ML, Sebo TJ.
    Urology; 2006 Jul 01; 68(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 16844452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.