These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

326 related items for PubMed ID: 21571677

  • 1. Comparison of film and digital fundus photographs in eyes of individuals with diabetes mellitus.
    Gangaputra S, Almukhtar T, Glassman AR, Aiello LP, Bressler N, Bressler SB, Danis RP, Davis MD, Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Aug 03; 52(9):6168-73. PubMed ID: 21571677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT, Weis E, Ting A, Hinz BJ, Greve MD.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep 03; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: 1 and 3 nonmydriatic 45-degree digital fundus photographs vs 7 standard early treatment diabetic retinopathy study fields.
    Vujosevic S, Benetti E, Massignan F, Pilotto E, Varano M, Cavarzeran F, Avogaro A, Midena E.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul 03; 148(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 19406376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
    Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, Noble J, Aiello LM, Aiello LP.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep 03; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of digital and film grading of diabetic retinopathy severity in the diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study.
    Hubbard LD, Sun W, Cleary PA, Danis RP, Hainsworth DP, Peng Q, Susman RA, Aiello LP, Davis MD, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study Research Group.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2011 Jun 03; 129(6):718-26. PubMed ID: 21670338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of Prevalence of Diabetic Macular Edema Based on Monocular Fundus Photography vs Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Wang YT, Tadarati M, Wolfson Y, Bressler SB, Bressler NM.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb 03; 134(2):222-8. PubMed ID: 26719967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of Handheld Retinal Imaging with ETDRS 7-Standard Field Photography for Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema.
    Salongcay RP, Aquino LAC, Salva CMG, Saunar AV, Alog GP, Sun JK, Peto T, Silva PS.
    Ophthalmol Retina; 2022 Jul 03; 6(7):548-556. PubMed ID: 35278726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Standard 7-Field Imaging With Ultrawide-Field Imaging for Determining Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy.
    Aiello LP, Odia I, Glassman AR, Melia M, Jampol LM, Bressler NM, Kiss S, Silva PS, Wykoff CC, Sun JK, Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan 01; 137(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 30347105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy.
    Bursell SE, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA, Clermont AC, Birkmire-Peters D, Aiello LP, Aiello LM, Joslin Vision Network Research Team.
    Ophthalmology; 2001 Mar 01; 108(3):572-85. PubMed ID: 11237913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields.
    Boucher MC, Gresset JA, Angioi K, Olivier S.
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec 01; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.
    Ruamviboonsuk P, Teerasuwanajak K, Tiensuwan M, Yuttitham K, Thai Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy Study Group.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 May 01; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of patients with diabetic retinopathy: accuracy of the Inoveon diabetic retinopathy-3DT system.
    Fransen SR, Leonard-Martin TC, Feuer WJ, Hildebrand PL, Inoveon Health Research Group.
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar 01; 109(3):595-601. PubMed ID: 11874767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Digital versus film Fundus photography for research grading of diabetic retinopathy severity.
    Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Esquivel A, Florez-Arango JF, Ferrier NJ, Krupinski EA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Nov 01; 51(11):5846-52. PubMed ID: 20484593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.