These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

326 related items for PubMed ID: 21571677

  • 21. An extension of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) system for grading of diabetic macular edema in the Astemizole Retinopathy Trial.
    Gardner TW, Sander B, Larsen ML, Kunselman A, Tenhave T, Lund-Andersen H, Reimers J, Hubbard L, Blankenship GW, Quillen DA, Brod RD, Wilmarth MH, Post-Hansen H, Parving HH, Davis MD.
    Curr Eye Res; 2006 Jun; 31(6):535-47. PubMed ID: 16769613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of standardized clinical classification with fundus photograph grading for the assessment of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema severity.
    Gangaputra S, Lovato JF, Hubbard L, Davis MD, Esser BA, Ambrosius WT, Chew EY, Greven C, Perdue LH, Wong WT, Condren A, Wilkinson CP, Agrón E, Adler S, Danis RP, ACCORD Eye Research Group.
    Retina; 2013 Jun; 33(7):1393-9. PubMed ID: 23615341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Diabetic macular edema assessed with optical coherence tomography and stereo fundus photography.
    Strøm C, Sander B, Larsen N, Larsen M, Lund-Andersen H.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jan; 43(1):241-5. PubMed ID: 11773037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The Relationship of Retinal Vessel Geometric Characteristics to the Incidence and Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy.
    Klein R, Lee KE, Danforth L, Tsai MY, Gangnon RE, Meuer SE, Wong TY, Cheung CY, Klein BEK.
    Ophthalmology; 2018 Nov; 125(11):1784-1792. PubMed ID: 29779685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Comparison of objective retinal thickness analysis and subjective stereo fundus photography in diabetic macular edema.
    Strøm C, Sander B.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 May; 45(5):1450-5. PubMed ID: 15111601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
    Lin DY, Blumenkranz MS, Brothers RJ, Grosvenor DM.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A comparison of quantitative mapping and stereoscopic fundus photography grading of retinal thickness in diabetic eyes with macular edema.
    Yang Y, Vitale S, Ding Y, O'Connell SR, Alexander J, Bressler NM, Schachat AP, Zeimer R.
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2003 Aug; 34(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 12569999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Identification of diabetic retinopathy by stereoscopic digital imaging via teleophthalmology: a comparison to slide film.
    Tennant MT, Greve MD, Rudnisky CJ, Hillson TR, Hinz BJ.
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 36(4):187-96. PubMed ID: 11428527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultrawide field imaging: distribution and potential impact on diabetic retinopathy severity.
    Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, Soliman AZ, Aiello LM, Aiello LP.
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Dec; 120(12):2587-2595. PubMed ID: 23778092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Comparison of dilated fundus examinations with seven-field stereo fundus photographs in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial.
    Emanuele N, Klein R, Moritz T, Davis MD, Glander K, Anderson R, Reda D, Duckworth W, Abraira C, VADT Study Group.
    J Diabetes Complications; 2009 Dec; 23(5):323-9. PubMed ID: 18406632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy.
    Saari JM, Summanen P, Kivelä T, Saari KM.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Apr; 82(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 15043527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity.
    Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Esquivel A, Florez-Arango JF, Krupinski EA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):3184-92. PubMed ID: 20053978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Prevalence and associated factors of diabetic retinopathy among people with diabetes screened using fundus photography at a community diabetic retinopathy screening program in Nepal.
    Thapa R, Sharma S, Pradhan E, Duwal S, Poudel M, Shrestha KG, Paudyal GP.
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Oct 23; 23(1):429. PubMed ID: 37872518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Mosaics versus Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy seven standard fields for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity.
    Li HK, Esquivel A, Hubbard LD, Florez-Arango JF, Danis RP, Krupinski EA.
    Retina; 2011 Sep 23; 31(8):1553-63. PubMed ID: 21522039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Ultra-Widefield and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study 7-Field Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy.
    Aiello LP, Blodi B, Gao X, Sun JK, Gubitosi-Klug RA, White NH, Hainsworth D, Lorenzi GM, Bebu I, DCCT/EDIC Research Group.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2024 Sep 01; 142(9):856-863. PubMed ID: 39145984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Methods and reproducibility of grading optimized digital color fundus photographs in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2 Report Number 2).
    Danis RP, Domalpally A, Chew EY, Clemons TE, Armstrong J, SanGiovanni JP, Ferris FL, AREDS2 Study Group.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jul 08; 54(7):4548-54. PubMed ID: 23620429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.