These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

262 related items for PubMed ID: 21577124

  • 1. Multicenter comparison of high concentration contrast agent iomeprol-400 with iso-osmolar iodixanol-320: contrast enhancement and heart rate variation in coronary dual-source computed tomographic angiography.
    Becker CR, Vanzulli A, Fink C, de Faveri D, Fedeli S, Dore R, Biondetti P, Kuettner A, Krix M, Ascenti G.
    Invest Radiol; 2011 Jul; 46(7):457-64. PubMed ID: 21577124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Coronary stent evaluation with coronary computed tomographic angiography: comparison between low-osmolar, high-iodine concentration iomeprol-400 and iso-osmolar, lower-iodine concentration iodixanol-320.
    Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, Bartorelli AL, Conte E, Bertella E, Baggiano A, Annoni A, Formenti A, Ballerini G, Agostoni P, Fiorentini C, Pepi M.
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014 Jul; 8(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 24582042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography.
    Sahani DV, Soulez G, Chen KM, Lepanto L, Xu JR, Nelson RC, Grazioli L, Vanzulli A, Heiken JP, Investigators of the IMPACT Study.
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):856-61. PubMed ID: 18007158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on patient heart rate and pressures during intra-cardiac or intra-arterial injection.
    Schmid I, Didier D, Pfammatter T, Garachemani A, Fleisch M, Kirchin MA, Meier B.
    Int J Cardiol; 2007 Jun 12; 118(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 17376548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Heart rate variability and heat sensation during CT coronary angiography: Low-osmolar versus iso-osmolar contrast media.
    Svensson A, Ripsweden J, Rück A, Aspelin P, Cederlund K, Brismar BT.
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep 12; 51(7):722-6. PubMed ID: 20568977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of the effect of low- and iso-osmolar contrast agents on heart rate during chest CT angiography: results of a prospective randomized multicenter study.
    Chartrand-Lefebvre C, White CS, Bhalla S, Mayo-Smith WW, Prenovault J, Vydareny KH, Soto JA, Ozkan OS, Chughtai AR, Soulez G.
    Radiology; 2011 Mar 12; 258(3):930-7. PubMed ID: 21212367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of a low-osmolar contrast medium, iopamidol, and an iso-osmolar contrast medium, iodixanol, in MDCT coronary angiography.
    Ozbulbul NI, Yurdakul M, Tola M.
    Coron Artery Dis; 2010 Nov 12; 21(7):414-9. PubMed ID: 20671550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Four-detector row computed tomographic angiography in the evaluation of infrarenal aorta and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: influence of contrast medium concentration.
    Iezzi R, Cotroneo AR, Filippone A, Giancristofaro D, Storto ML.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008 Nov 12; 32(5):690-6. PubMed ID: 18830096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Enhancement and safety of iomeprol-400 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing abdominal multidetector CT.
    Romano L, Grazioli L, Bonomo L, Xu JR, Chen KM, Dore R, Vanzulli A, Catalano C.
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Mar 12; 82(975):204-11. PubMed ID: 19064592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The Influence of Contrast Agent's Osmolarity on Iodine Delivery Protocol in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Comparison Between Iso-Osmolar Iodixanol-320 and Low-Osmolar Iomeprol-370.
    Yang X, Huang W, Liu W, Zhu Y, Xu Y, Yang G, Tang L, Zhu X.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018 Mar 12; 42(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 28708716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Iodixanol versus Iopromide at Coronary CT Angiography: Lumen Opacification and Effect on Heart Rhythm-the Randomized IsoCOR Trial.
    Lubbers MM, Kock M, Niezen A, Galema T, Kofflard M, Bruning T, Kooij HS, van Valen H, Dijkshoorn M, Booij R, Padmos A, Vogels A, Budde RPJ, Nieman K.
    Radiology; 2018 Jan 12; 286(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 28809582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Contrast bolus optimization for cardiac 16-slice computed tomography: comparison of contrast medium formulations containing 300 and 400 milligrams of iodine per milliliter.
    Rist C, Nikolaou K, Kirchin MA, van Gessel R, Bae KT, von Ziegler F, Knez A, Wintersperger BJ, Reiser MF, Becker CR.
    Invest Radiol; 2006 May 12; 41(5):460-7. PubMed ID: 16625109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. High iodine concentration contrast material for noninvasive multislice computed tomography coronary angiography: iopromide 370 versus iomeprol 400.
    Cademartiri F, de Monye C, Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, van der Lugt A, Midiri M, de Feyter PJ, Lagalla R, Krestin GP.
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Mar 12; 41(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 16481919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Diagnostic Accuracy, Image Quality, and Patient Comfort for Coronary CT Angiography Performed Using Iso-Osmolar versus Low-Osmolar Iodinated Contrast: A Prospective International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Nakazato R, Arsanjani R, Shalev A, Leipsic JA, Gransar H, Lin FY, Gomez M, Berman DS, Min JK.
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Jun 12; 23(6):743-51. PubMed ID: 27178781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Coronary computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery bypass grafts: comparison between low-concentration Iodixanol 270 and Iohexol 350.
    Wang H, Xu L, Zhang N, Fan Z, Zhang Z, Sun Z.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015 Jun 12; 39(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 25299799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The ACTIVE Trial: comparison of the effects on renal function of iomeprol-400 and iodixanol-320 in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing abdominal computed tomography.
    Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Erley CM, Grazioli L, Bonomo L, Ni Z, Romano L, Investigators in the Abdominal Computed Tomography: IOMERON 400 Versus VISIPAQUE 320 Enhancement (ACTIVE) Study.
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Mar 12; 43(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 18301313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. 80-kV pulmonary CT angiography with 40 mL of iodinated contrast material in lean patients: comparison of vascular enhancement with iodixanol (320 mg I/mL)and iomeprol (400 mg I/mL).
    Faggioni L, Neri E, Sbragia P, Pascale R, D'Errico L, Caramella D, Bartolozzi C.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec 12; 199(6):1220-5. PubMed ID: 23169711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of iopamidol-370 versus iodixanol-320 on coronary contrast, branch depiction, and heart rate variability in dual-source coronary MDCT angiography.
    Christensen JD, Meyer LT, Hurwitz LM, Boll DT.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep 12; 197(3):W445-51. PubMed ID: 21862771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. MDCT angiography for detection of pulmonary emboli: comparison between equi-iodine doses of iomeprol 400 mgI/mL and iodixanol 320 mgI/mL.
    Langenberger H, Friedrich K, Plank C, Matzek W, Wolf F, Storto ML, Schaefer-Prokop C, Herold C.
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jun 12; 70(3):579-88. PubMed ID: 18384995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Choice of contrast medium in patients with impaired renal function undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Wessely R, Koppara T, Bradaric C, Vorpahl M, Braun S, Schulz S, Mehilli J, Schömig A, Kastrati A, Contrast Media and Nephrotoxicity Following Coronary Revascularization by Angioplasty Trial Investigators.
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Oct 12; 2(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 20031753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.