These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


591 related items for PubMed ID: 21585587

  • 1. Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses.
    Dogus SM, Kurtz KS, Watanabe I, Griggs JA.
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 21585587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I, Sailer T, Stawarczyk B, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Jul; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Effects of a Vertical Compressive Cyclic Load on Abutment Screws and the Stability of the Prosthesis in Nonengaging and Partially Engaging Abutments in a Screw-Retained Splinted Fixed Dental Prosthesis.
    Kwan JC, Kwan N.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022 Jul; 37(3):571-578. PubMed ID: 35727250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
    Freitas AC, Bonfante EA, Rocha EP, Silva NR, Marotta L, Coelho PG.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK, Judge RB, Palamara JE, Swain MV.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C, Odman P, Ortengren U, Karlsson S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 May; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of cantilever length and framework alloy on the stress distribution of mandibular-cantilevered implant-supported prostheses.
    Jacques LB, Moura MS, Suedam V, Souza EA, Rubo JH.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):737-41. PubMed ID: 19489929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM, Masri R, Driscoll CF, Limkangwalmongkol P, Romberg E.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
    Kolbeck C, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.