These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
399 related items for PubMed ID: 21596255
1. Evaluation of Scheimpflug imaging parameters in subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus, and normal eyes. Uçakhan ÖÖ, Cetinkor V, Özkan M, Kanpolat A. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Jun; 37(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 21596255 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of reference body selection in calculating posterior corneal elevation and prediction of keratoconus using rotating Scheimpflug camera. Kovács I, Miháltz K, Ecsedy M, Németh J, Nagy ZZ. Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 89(3):e251-6. PubMed ID: 21106048 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus. de Sanctis U, Loiacono C, Richiardi L, Turco D, Mutani B, Grignolo FM. Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1534-9. PubMed ID: 18405974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus. Piñero DP, Alió JL, Alesón A, Escaf Vergara M, Miranda M. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):814-25. PubMed ID: 20457375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of normal and keratoconic corneas by Galilei Dual-Scheimpflug Analyzer. Demir S, Sönmez B, Yeter V, Ortak H. Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Oct; 36(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 23642799 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus. Smadja D, Santhiago MR, Mello GR, Krueger RR, Colin J, Touboul D. J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 23557226 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mapping corneal thickness using dual-scheimpflug imaging at different stages of keratoconus. Demir S, Ortak H, Yeter V, Alim S, Sayn O, Taş U, Sönmez B. Cornea; 2013 Nov; 32(11):1470-4. PubMed ID: 24071809 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and repeatability of swept-source Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus. Szalai E, Berta A, Hassan Z, Módis L. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 38(3):485-94. PubMed ID: 22261325 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ocular response analyzer measurements in keratoconus with normal central corneal thickness compared with matched normal control eyes. Fontes BM, Ambrósio R, Velarde GC, Nosé W. J Refract Surg; 2011 Mar; 27(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 20481414 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients. Muftuoglu O, Ayar O, Hurmeric V, Orucoglu F, Kılıc I. J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases. Ruiseñor Vázquez PR, Galletti JD, Minguez N, Delrivo M, Fuentes Bonthoux F, Pförtner T, Galletti JG. Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):32-40.e2. PubMed ID: 24709808 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data. Arbelaez MC, Versaci F, Vestri G, Barboni P, Savini G. Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Anterior, Posterior, and Total Corneal Astigmatism Measured Using a Single Scheimpflug Camera in Healthy and Keratoconus Eyes. Choi Y, Eom Y, Song JS, Kim HM. Korean J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 32(3):163-171. PubMed ID: 29770640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]