These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

108 related items for PubMed ID: 21597208

  • 1. An eighteen-month clinical evaluation of posterior restorations with fluoride releasing adhesive and composite systems.
    Akimoto N, Ohmori K, Hanabusa M, Momoi Y.
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(3):411-8. PubMed ID: 21597208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV, Blaser PK, Watson RE, Mjör IA, McEdward DL, Sensi LG, Riley JL.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material: results at eight years.
    Gordan VV, Mondragon E, Watson RE, Garvan C, Mjör IA.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 May; 138(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 17473040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material: two-year clinical evaluation.
    Gordan VV, Mjör IA, Vazquez O, Watson RE, Wilson N.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002 May; 14(5):296-302. PubMed ID: 12405585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
    Rocha Gomes Torres C, Rêgo HM, Perote LC, Santos LF, Kamozaki MB, Gutierrez NC, Di Nicoló R, Borges AB.
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
    Coelho-de-Souza FH, Klein-Júnior CA, Camargo JC, Beskow T, Balestrin MD, Demarco FF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar 01; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
    Kiremitci A, Alpaslan T, Gurgan S.
    Oper Dent; 2009 Mar 01; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
    da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguércio AD, Demarco FF.
    J Dent; 2006 Aug 01; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, Yadav H.
    J Dent; 2014 May 01; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS, Neto RG, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Navarro MF, de Carvalho RM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May 01; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF.
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb 01; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
    Brackett MG, Dib A, Brackett WW, Estrada BE, Reyes AA.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Feb 01; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.
    Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R.
    J Adhes Dent; 2001 Feb 01; 3(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 11570687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth.
    Gianordoli Neto R, Santiago SL, Mendonça JS, Passos VF, Lauris JR, Navarro MF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May 01; 9(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 18473024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Three-year clinical performance of a compomer in stress-bearing restorations in permanent posterior teeth.
    Huth KC, Manhard J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Aug 01; 16(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 14579881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Compomer materials and secondary caries formation.
    Hicks J, García-Godoy F, Milano M, Flaitz C.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct 01; 13(5):231-4. PubMed ID: 11764107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Longitudinal micromorphological 15-year results of posterior composite restorations using three-dimensional scanning electron microscopy.
    Dietz W, Montag R, Kraft U, Walther M, Sigusch BW, Gaengler P.
    J Dent; 2014 Aug 01; 42(8):959-69. PubMed ID: 24814136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. One-year retrospective clinical evaluation of hybrid composite restorations placed in United Kingdom general practices.
    Burke FJ, Crisp RJ, Bell TJ, Healy A, Mark B, McBirnie R, Osborne-Smith KL.
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr 01; 32(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 12066649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of two-step adhesive systems on inhibition of secondary caries around fluoride-releasing resin composite restorations in root dentine.
    Itota T, Nakabo S, Narukami T, Tashiro Y, Torii Y, McCabe JF, Yoshiyama M.
    J Dent; 2005 Feb 01; 33(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 15683896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW, Kieri C, Carlén M.
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul 01; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.