These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


262 related items for PubMed ID: 21598200

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Fragment-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (FB-QSAR) for fragment-based drug design.
    Du QS, Huang RB, Wei YT, Pang ZW, Du LQ, Chou KC.
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Jan 30; 30(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 18613071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. QSAR prediction of estrogen activity for a large set of diverse chemicals under the guidance of OECD principles.
    Liu H, Papa E, Gramatica P.
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2006 Nov 30; 19(11):1540-8. PubMed ID: 17112243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Performance of (consensus) kNN QSAR for predicting estrogenic activity in a large diverse set of organic compounds.
    Asikainen AH, Ruuskanen J, Tuppurainen KA.
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004 Feb 30; 15(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15113066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fingerprint-based clustering applied to define a QSAR model use radius.
    Sprous DG.
    J Mol Graph Model; 2008 Sep 30; 27(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 18556228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparative Analysis of QSAR-based vs. Chemical Similarity Based Predictors of GPCRs Binding Affinity.
    Luo M, Wang XS, Tropsha A.
    Mol Inform; 2016 Jan 30; 35(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 27491652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of specificity and subtype selectivity of ligands binding to serotonin receptors 5HT1E and 5HT1F.
    Wang XS, Tang H, Golbraikh A, Tropsha A.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May 30; 48(5):997-1013. PubMed ID: 18470978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Probabilistic neural networks modeling of the 48-h LC50 acute toxicity endpoint to Daphnia magna.
    Niculescu SP, Lewis MA, Tigner J.
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2008 May 30; 19(7-8):735-50. PubMed ID: 19061086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.