These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

156 related items for PubMed ID: 21613011

  • 21. Pre-analytical workstations: a tool for reducing laboratory errors.
    Da Rin G.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 19302988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Analytical validation of the results].
    Vassault A, Arnaud J, Szymanovicz A, membres du sous-groupe 2 analytique.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010 Dec; 68 Spec No 1():223-6. PubMed ID: 21613019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The most common nonconformities encountered during the assessments of medical laboratories in Hong Kong using ISO 15189 as accreditation criteria.
    Ho B, Ho E.
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2012 Dec; 22(2):247-57. PubMed ID: 22838190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Digital workflow management for quality assessment in pathology.
    Kalinski T, Sel S, Hofmann H, Zwönitzer R, Bernarding J, Roessner A.
    Pathol Res Pract; 2008 Dec; 204(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 18096328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Guidelines for the pre-examination processing and transport of medical laboratory samples].
    Annette-Reisch M, Soubiran P, Szymanowicz A, membres du sous-groupe 1 pré-analytique.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010 Dec; 68 Spec No 1():111-29. PubMed ID: 21613010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Facility capability assessment.
    McCandless J.
    Qual Assur; 1994 Jun; 3(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 7804631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Internal quality control].
    Giroud C, Arnaud J, Adjidé V, Vassault A, membres du sous-groupe 2 analytique.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010 Dec; 68 Spec No 1():203-21. PubMed ID: 21613018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A quality manual for the clinical laboratory including the elements of a quality system. Proposed guidelines.
    Dybkaer R, Jordal R, Jørgensen PJ, Hansson P, Hjelm M, Kaihola HL, Kallner A, Rustad P, Uldall A, de Verdier CH.
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1993 Dec; 212():60-84. PubMed ID: 8465158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Quality improvements in the preanalytical phase: focus on urine specimen workflow.
    Stankovic AK, DiLauri E.
    Clin Lab Med; 2008 Jun; 28(2):339-50, viii. PubMed ID: 18436075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The impact of specimen management in microbiology.
    Miller JM.
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 May; 30(5):28-30, 32, 34; quiz 35-6. PubMed ID: 10179685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Practical solution for control of the pre-analytical phase in decentralized clinical laboratories for meeting the requirements of the medical laboratory accreditation standard DIN EN ISO 15189.
    Vacata V, Jahns-Streubel G, Baldus M, Wood WG.
    Clin Lab; 2007 May; 53(3-4):211-5. PubMed ID: 17447659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Practical use of computerized hospital information systems to improve blood transfusion.
    Butch SH.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Apr; 107(4 Suppl 1):S50-6. PubMed ID: 9124230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Effects of non-analytical factors on the quality of laboratory results.
    Manochiopinij S, Sirisali K, Leelahakul P.
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999 Apr; 30 Suppl 3():50-3. PubMed ID: 10926259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The significance of policies relating to clinical laboratory specimens.
    Ogram D.
    Can J Med Technol; 1991 Apr; 53(2):79-80. PubMed ID: 10112876
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Laboratory quality control, quality assurance and laboratory management.
    Penner DW.
    East Afr Med J; 1993 Apr; 70(4 Suppl):14-5. PubMed ID: 8223300
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Challenge of quality assurance for routine cultures.
    Kim SJ.
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2008 Apr; 12(4):359-60. PubMed ID: 18371258
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Computer validation in the GLP field.
    Doherty JB.
    Qual Assur; 1993 Dec; 2(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 7952965
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Changing technologies in the reference laboratory.
    O'Sullivan MB.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1987 Jul; 111(7):657-61. PubMed ID: 3606343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Lot quality assurance sampling of sputum acid-fast bacillus smears for assessing sputum smear microscopy centers.
    Selvakumar N, Murthy BN, Prabhakaran E, Sivagamasundari S, Vasanthan S, Perumal M, Govindaraju R, Chauhan LS, Wares F, Santha T, Narayanan PR.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Feb; 43(2):913-5. PubMed ID: 15695704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Assessment of biological sampling's quality in a medical laboratory: case of Côte d' Ivoire Institute Pasteur].
    Kouassi-M'Bengue A, Koffi S, Manizan P, Ouattara A, N'Douba AK, Dosso M.
    Mali Med; 2008 Feb; 23(2):16-20. PubMed ID: 19434962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.