These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
299 related items for PubMed ID: 21622482
1. Assessing the five factors of personality in adolescents: the junior version of the Spanish NEO-PI-R. Ortet G, Ibáñez MI, Moya J, Villa H, Viruela A, Mezquita L. Assessment; 2012 Mar; 19(1):114-30. PubMed ID: 21622482 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Junior version of the Spanish NEO PI-R (JS NEO)]. Ortet G, Ibáñez MI, Ruipérez MA, Villa H, Moya J, Escrivá P. Psicothema; 2007 May; 19(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 17425897 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The MCMI-III personality disorders scores predicted by the NEO-FFI-R and the ZKPQ-50-CC: a comparative study. Aluja A, García LF, Cuevas L, García O. J Pers Disord; 2007 Feb; 21(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 17373890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the self-report Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire -4+ (PDQ-4+) in psychiatric outpatients. Calvo N, Gutiérrez F, Andión O, Caseras X, Torrubia R, Casas M. Psicothema; 2012 Feb; 24(1):156-60. PubMed ID: 22269379 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A five-factor model perspective on psychopathy and comorbid Axis-II disorders in a forensic-psychiatric sample. Decuyper M, De Fruyt F, Buschman J. Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008 Feb; 31(5):394-406. PubMed ID: 18790537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria. Caldwell-Andrews A, Baer RA, Berry DT. J Pers Assess; 2000 Jun; 74(3):472-88. PubMed ID: 10900573 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Factor structure of the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire and its relationship with the revised NEO personality inventory in a Japanese sample. Maruta T, Yamate T, Iimori M, Kato M, Livesley WJ. Compr Psychiatry; 2006 Jun; 47(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 17067879 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?]. Courtois R, Petot JM, Lignier B, Lecocq G, Plaisant O. Encephale; 2018 Jun; 44(3):208-214. PubMed ID: 28364967 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The validity and utility of the positive presentation management and negative presentation management scales for the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Sellbom M, Bagby RM. Assessment; 2008 Jun; 15(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 18463407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The five-factor model and its assessment in clinical settings. McCrae RR. J Pers Assess; 1991 Dec; 57(3):399-14. PubMed ID: 1757868 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Semantic response consistency and protocol validity in structured personality assessment: the case of the NEO-PI-R. Kurtz JE, Parrish CL. J Pers Assess; 2001 Apr; 76(2):315-32. PubMed ID: 11393463 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six Personality Questionnaires. Thalmayer AG, Saucier G, Eigenhuis A. Psychol Assess; 2011 Dec; 23(4):995-1009. PubMed ID: 21859221 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Stability and change in personality assessment: the revised NEO Personality Inventory in the year 2000. Costa PT, McCrae RR. J Pers Assess; 1997 Feb; 68(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 9018844 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]