These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention. Rose E, Frucht S, Jonas IE. Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 12238688 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods. Elekdag-Turk S, Isci D, Ozkalayci N, Turk T. Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. Shammaa I, Ngan P, Kim H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, Brown C. Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts. Soares CJ, Santana FR, Pereira JC, Araujo TS, Menezes MS. J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 18514666 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Indirect bonding--do custom bases need a plastic conditioner? A randomised clinical trial. Miles P. Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 21175018 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Shear bond strength of metal brackets on enamel. Cozza P, Martucci L, De Toffol L, Penco SI. Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):851-6. PubMed ID: 17029521 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of survival time between two types of orthodontic fixed retainer: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Salehi P, Zarif Najafi H, Roeinpeikar SM. Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep 11; 14():25. PubMed ID: 24326013 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Six-month bracket survival with a self-etch adhesive. dos Santos JE, Quioca J, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep 11; 76(5):863-8. PubMed ID: 17029523 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Metallic brackets bonded with resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements under different enamel conditions. Pithon MM, Dos Santos RL, de Oliveira MV, Ruellas AC, Romano FL. Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul 11; 76(4):700-4. PubMed ID: 16808580 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. LED vs halogen light-curing of adhesive-precoated brackets. Mirabella D, Spena R, Scognamiglio G, Luca L, Gracco A, Siciliani G. Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep 11; 78(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 18298197 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of laser enamel-etching on the bond strength of resin-bonded retainers. el-Karaksi AO. Egypt Dent J; 1994 Oct 11; 40(4):897-902. PubMed ID: 9588132 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel. Duarte S, Botta AC, Meire M, Sadan A. J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep 11; 100(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18762032 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. Millett DT, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, McColl J. Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb 11; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro debonding of orthodontic retainers analyzed with finite element analysis. Milheiro A, de Jager N, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ. Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct 11; 37(5):491-6. PubMed ID: 25452631 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]