These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

245 related items for PubMed ID: 21645849

  • 1. Improved technologies now routinely provide protein NMR structures useful for molecular replacement.
    Mao B, Guan R, Montelione GT.
    Structure; 2011 Jun 08; 19(6):757-66. PubMed ID: 21645849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Improving NMR protein structure quality by Rosetta refinement: a molecular replacement study.
    Ramelot TA, Raman S, Kuzin AP, Xiao R, Ma LC, Acton TB, Hunt JF, Montelione GT, Baker D, Kennedy MA.
    Proteins; 2009 Apr 08; 75(1):147-67. PubMed ID: 18816799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Protein NMR structures refined with Rosetta have higher accuracy relative to corresponding X-ray crystal structures.
    Mao B, Tejero R, Baker D, Montelione GT.
    J Am Chem Soc; 2014 Feb 05; 136(5):1893-906. PubMed ID: 24392845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Crystallographic phasing with NMR models: an envelope approach.
    Zhang W, Zhang T, Zhang H, Hao Q.
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2014 Jul 05; 70(Pt 7):1977-82. PubMed ID: 25004974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. phenix.mr_rosetta: molecular replacement and model rebuilding with Phenix and Rosetta.
    Terwilliger TC, Dimaio F, Read RJ, Baker D, Bunkóczi G, Adams PD, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Afonine PV, Echols N.
    J Struct Funct Genomics; 2012 Jun 05; 13(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 22418934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Rosetta Structure Prediction as a Tool for Solving Difficult Molecular Replacement Problems.
    DiMaio F.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017 Jun 05; 1607():455-466. PubMed ID: 28573585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluating the quality of NMR structures by local density of protons.
    Ban YE, Rudolph J, Zhou P, Edelsbrunner H.
    Proteins; 2006 Mar 01; 62(4):852-64. PubMed ID: 16342274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Protein NMR structures refined without NOE data.
    Ryu H, Kim TR, Ahn S, Ji S, Lee J.
    PLoS One; 2014 Mar 01; 9(10):e108888. PubMed ID: 25279564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Robust and highly accurate automatic NOESY assignment and structure determination with Rosetta.
    Zhang Z, Porter J, Tripsianes K, Lange OF.
    J Biomol NMR; 2014 Jul 01; 59(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 24845473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. X-ray vs. NMR structures as templates for computational protein design.
    Schneider M, Fu X, Keating AE.
    Proteins; 2009 Oct 01; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 19422060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Combination of NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography offers unique advantages for elucidation of the structural basis of protein complex assembly.
    Feng W, Pan L, Zhang M.
    Sci China Life Sci; 2011 Feb 01; 54(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 21318479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Factors influencing estimates of coordinate error for molecular replacement.
    Hatti KS, McCoy AJ, Oeffner RD, Sammito MD, Read RJ.
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2020 Jan 01; 76(Pt 1):19-27. PubMed ID: 31909740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A community resource of experimental data for NMR / X-ray crystal structure pairs.
    Everett JK, Tejero R, Murthy SB, Acton TB, Aramini JM, Baran MC, Benach J, Cort JR, Eletsky A, Forouhar F, Guan R, Kuzin AP, Lee HW, Liu G, Mani R, Mao B, Mills JL, Montelione AF, Pederson K, Powers R, Ramelot T, Rossi P, Seetharaman J, Snyder D, Swapna GV, Vorobiev SM, Wu Y, Xiao R, Yang Y, Arrowsmith CH, Hunt JF, Kennedy MA, Prestegard JH, Szyperski T, Tong L, Montelione GT.
    Protein Sci; 2016 Jan 01; 25(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 26293815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Improved molecular replacement by density- and energy-guided protein structure optimization.
    DiMaio F, Terwilliger TC, Read RJ, Wlodawer A, Oberdorfer G, Wagner U, Valkov E, Alon A, Fass D, Axelrod HL, Das D, Vorobiev SM, Iwaï H, Pokkuluri PR, Baker D.
    Nature; 2011 May 26; 473(7348):540-3. PubMed ID: 21532589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Using iterative fragment assembly and progressive sequence truncation to facilitate phasing and crystal structure determination of distantly related proteins.
    Wang Y, Virtanen J, Xue Z, Tesmer JJ, Zhang Y.
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2016 May 26; 72(Pt 5):616-28. PubMed ID: 27139625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. MR-REX: molecular replacement by cooperative conformational search and occupancy optimization on low-accuracy protein models.
    Virtanen JJ, Zhang Y.
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2018 Jul 01; 74(Pt 7):606-620. PubMed ID: 29968671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of NMR and crystal structures of membrane proteins and computational refinement to improve model quality.
    Koehler Leman J, D'Avino AR, Bhatnagar Y, Gray JJ.
    Proteins; 2018 Jan 01; 86(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 29044728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Computational challenges for macromolecular structure determination by X-ray crystallography and solution NMR-spectroscopy.
    Brünger AT, Nilges M.
    Q Rev Biophys; 1993 Feb 01; 26(1):49-125. PubMed ID: 8210313
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Application of the AMPLE cluster-and-truncate approach to NMR structures for molecular replacement.
    Bibby J, Keegan RM, Mayans O, Winn MD, Rigden DJ.
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2013 Nov 01; 69(Pt 11):2194-201. PubMed ID: 24189230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Ribosomal protein L9: a structure determination by the combined use of X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy.
    Hoffman DW, Cameron CS, Davies C, White SW, Ramakrishnan V.
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Dec 20; 264(5):1058-71. PubMed ID: 9000630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.