These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

589 related items for PubMed ID: 21655130

  • 21. Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits.
    Anderson JJ, Rode DC, Zhai H, Fischbeck PS.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Aug 16; 56(16):11162-11171. PubMed ID: 35926127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Reducing the energy penalty costs of postcombustion CCS systems with amine-storage.
    Patiño-Echeverri D, Hoppock DC.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan 17; 46(2):1243-52. PubMed ID: 22214538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Deployment models for commercialized carbon capture and storage.
    Esposito RA, Monroe LS, Friedman JS.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan 01; 45(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 20722437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The cost of carbon capture and storage for natural gas combined cycle power plants.
    Rubin ES, Zhai H.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar 20; 46(6):3076-84. PubMed ID: 22332665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration from U.S. Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants.
    Psarras P, He J, Pilorgé H, McQueen N, Jensen-Fellows A, Kian K, Wilcox J.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 May 19; 54(10):6272-6280. PubMed ID: 32329614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. CO2 capture and storage: A way forward for sustainable environment.
    Anwar MN, Fayyaz A, Sohail NF, Khokhar MF, Baqar M, Khan WD, Rasool K, Rehan M, Nizami AS.
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Nov 15; 226():131-144. PubMed ID: 30114572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Are renewables portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy?
    Dobesova K, Apt J, Lave LB.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov 15; 39(22):8578-83. PubMed ID: 16323750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Environmental and economic evaluation of bioenergy in Ontario, Canada.
    Zhang Y, Habibi S, MacLean HL.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Aug 15; 57(8):919-33. PubMed ID: 17824282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Long-term energy and climate implications of carbon capture and storage deployment strategies in the US coal-fired electricity fleet.
    Sathre R, Masanet E.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep 04; 46(17):9768-76. PubMed ID: 22857130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Assessment of potential carbon dioxide reductions due to biomass-coal cofiring in the United States.
    Robinson AL, Rhodes JS, Keith DW.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov 15; 37(22):5081-9. PubMed ID: 14655692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Development of multimode gas-fired combined-cycle chemical-looping combustion-based power plant layouts.
    Jayadevappa BR.
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug 15; 29(36):54967-54987. PubMed ID: 35307797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Sourcing of Steam and Electricity for Carbon Capture Retrofits.
    Supekar SD, Skerlos SJ.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Nov 07; 51(21):12908-12917. PubMed ID: 28968494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Life cycle assessment of combustion-based electricity generation technologies integrated with carbon capture and storage: A review.
    Wang Y, Pan Z, Zhang W, Borhani TN, Li R, Zhang Z.
    Environ Res; 2022 May 01; 207():112219. PubMed ID: 34656638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Assessment of potential, cost, and environmental benefits of CCS-EWR technology for coal-fired power plants in Yellow River Basin of China.
    Xu M, Zhang X, Shen S, Wei S, Fan JL.
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Aug 15; 292():112717. PubMed ID: 34015611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
    White CM, Strazisar BR, Granite EJ, Hoffman JS, Pennline HW, Air & Waste Management Association.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun 15; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Advancing adsorption and membrane separation processes for the gigaton carbon capture challenge.
    Wilcox J, Haghpanah R, Rupp EC, He J, Lee K.
    Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng; 2014 Jun 15; 5():479-505. PubMed ID: 24702296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. A life cycle assessment of coal-fired thermal power plants with post-combustion control techniques: an India scenario.
    Malode S, Prakash R, Mohanta JC.
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug 15; 30(39):90639-90655. PubMed ID: 37462868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation.
    Jaramillo P, Griffin WM, Matthews HS.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Sep 01; 41(17):6290-6. PubMed ID: 17937317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Stakeholder views on financing carbon capture and storage demonstration projects in China.
    Reiner D, Liang X.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan 17; 46(2):643-51. PubMed ID: 22191735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Coal and biomass to fuels and power.
    Williams RH, Liu G, Kreutz TG, Larson ED.
    Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng; 2011 Jan 17; 2():529-53. PubMed ID: 22432630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.