These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

340 related items for PubMed ID: 21671157

  • 1. Spatial working memory load affects counting but not subitizing in enumeration.
    Shimomura T, Kumada T.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1694-709. PubMed ID: 21671157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mathematics anxiety affects counting but not subitizing during visual enumeration.
    Maloney EA, Risko EF, Ansari D, Fugelsang J.
    Cognition; 2010 Feb; 114(2):293-7. PubMed ID: 19896124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Can subitizing survive the attentional blink? An ERP study.
    Xu X, Liu C.
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug 01; 440(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 18556118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Enumerating by pointing to locations: a new method for measuring the numerosity of visual object representations.
    Haladjian HH, Pylyshyn ZW.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb 01; 73(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 21264734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Consolidation of statistical information of multiple objects in working memory.
    Baijal S, Srinivasan N.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug 01; 73(6):1733-41. PubMed ID: 21607816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The role of eye movements in subitizing and counting.
    Watson DG, Maylor EA, Bruce LA.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec 01; 33(6):1389-99. PubMed ID: 18085951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. When do spatial and visual working memory interact?
    Wood JN.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb 01; 73(2):420-39. PubMed ID: 21264717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of pacing and working memory loads on error type patterns in a routine skill.
    Cassenti DN, Carlson RA.
    Am J Psychol; 2008 Feb 01; 121(1):57-81. PubMed ID: 18437802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Aging, task complexity, and efficiency modes: the influence of working memory involvement on age differences in response times for verbal and visuospatial tasks.
    Verhaeghen P, Cerella J, Basak C.
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006 Jun 01; 13(2):254-80. PubMed ID: 16807201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Working memory costs of task switching.
    Liefooghe B, Barrouillet P, Vandierendonck A, Camos V.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May 01; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Where do we look when we count? The role of eye movements in enumeration.
    Li X, Logan GD, Zbrodoff NJ.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb 01; 72(2):409-26. PubMed ID: 20139456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Executive working memory load does not compromise perceptual processing during visual search: evidence from additive factors analysis.
    He J, McCarley JS.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb 01; 72(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 20139447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Brain dynamics of attention and working memory engagement in subitizing.
    Pagano S, Lombardi L, Mazza V.
    Brain Res; 2014 Jan 16; 1543():244-52. PubMed ID: 24309139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task.
    van Dijck JP, Gevers W, Fias W.
    Cognition; 2009 Nov 16; 113(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 19726035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Binding facilitates attention switching within working memory.
    Bao M, Li ZH, Zhang DR.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep 16; 33(5):959-69. PubMed ID: 17723072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A role for spatial and nonspatial working memory processes in visual search.
    Anderson EJ, Mannan SK, Rees G, Sumner P, Kennard C.
    Exp Psychol; 2008 Sep 16; 55(5):301-12. PubMed ID: 25116297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: an individual differences investigation of focus switching.
    Unsworth N, Engle RW.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May 16; 34(3):616-30. PubMed ID: 18444760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Modulating attentional load affects numerosity estimation: evidence against a pre-attentive subitizing mechanism.
    Vetter P, Butterworth B, Bahrami B.
    PLoS One; 2008 Sep 24; 3(9):e3269. PubMed ID: 18813345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech.
    Francis AL.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb 24; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Intentional subitizing: exploring the role of automaticity in enumeration.
    Pincham HL, Szűcs D.
    Cognition; 2012 Aug 24; 124(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 22695378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.