These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Modular necks improve the range of hip motion in cases with excessively anteverted or retroverted femurs in THA. Matsushita A, Nakashima Y, Fujii M, Sato T, Iwamoto Y. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 468(12):3342-7. PubMed ID: 20473596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty. Higa M, Tanino H, Abo M, Kakunai S, Banks SA. J Biomech; 2011 Jun 03; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The combined anteversion technique for acetabular component anteversion. Amuwa C, Dorr LD. J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct 03; 23(7):1068-70. PubMed ID: 18534533 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A three-dimensional parameterized and visually kinematic simulation module for the theoretical range of motion of total hip arthroplasty. Ji WT, Tao K, Wang CT. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2010 Jun 03; 25(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 20189695 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses]. Ramaniraka NA, Rakotomanana LR, Rubin PJ, Leyvraz P. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct 03; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Widmer KH, Majewski M. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Aug 03; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Range of motion in a modular femoral stem system with a variety of neck options. Hariri S, Chun S, Cowan JB, Bragdon C, Malchau H, Rubash HE. J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct 03; 28(9):1625-33. PubMed ID: 23886407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty. Vendittoli PA, Ganapathi M, Nuño N, Plamondon D, Lavigne M. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Nov 03; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing femoral anteversion and offset after total hip arthroplasty, using a modular femoral neck system: an experimental study. Sakai T, Sugano N, Nishii T, Haraguchi K, Ochi T, Ohzono K. J Orthop Sci; 2000 Nov 03; 5(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 11180907 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach. Kessler O, Patil S, Wirth S, Mayr E, Colwell CW, D'Lima DD. J Orthop Res; 2008 Apr 03; 26(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 18050356 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter. Kluess D, Zietz C, Lindner T, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R. Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec 03; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. Yoshimine F. J Biomech; 2006 Dec 03; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Guidelines for implant placement to minimize impingement during activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty. Patel AB, Wagle RR, Usrey MM, Thompson MT, Incavo SJ, Noble PC. J Arthroplasty; 2010 Dec 03; 25(8):1275-81.e1. PubMed ID: 20022449 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]