These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

136 related items for PubMed ID: 21681596

  • 1. Uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension using delayed absorbable monofilament suture.
    Wong MJ, Rezvan A, Bhatia NN, Yazdany T.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1389-94. PubMed ID: 21681596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Retrospective Cohort of Absorbable and Permanent Suture Groups.
    Bradley MS, Bickhaus JA, Amundsen CL, Newcomb LK, Truong T, Weidner AC, Siddiqui NY.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018 Nov; 24(3):207-212. PubMed ID: 28657988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Permanent suture used in uterosacral ligament suspension offers better anatomical support than delayed absorbable suture.
    Chung CP, Miskimins R, Kuehl TJ, Yandell PM, Shull BL.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Feb; 23(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 21892683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A randomized controlled trial of permanent vs absorbable suture for uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Kowalski JT, Genadry R, Ten Eyck P, Bradley CS.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):785-790. PubMed ID: 32047968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse.
    Turner LC, Lavelle ES, Shepherd JP.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):797-803. PubMed ID: 26658893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Suture Complication Rates and Surgical Outcomes According to the Nonabsorbable Suture Materials Used in Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: Polyester versus Polypropylene.
    Lee J, Oh S, Jeon MJ.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 28(8):1503-1507. PubMed ID: 33310165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Uterosacral ligament fixation for vaginal vault suspension in uterine and vaginal vault prolapse.
    Jenkins VR.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Dec; 177(6):1337-43; discussion 1343-4. PubMed ID: 9423733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Is absorbable suture superior to permanent suture for uterosacral ligament suspension?
    Peng L, Liu YH, He SX, Di XP, Shen H, Luo DY.
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Sep; 39(7):1958-1965. PubMed ID: 32658368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Suture complications in a teaching institution among patients undergoing uterosacral ligament suspension with permanent braided suture.
    Yazdany T, Yip S, Bhatia NN, Nguyen JN.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2010 Jul; 21(7):813-8. PubMed ID: 20186391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Absorbable versus Permanent Suture for Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse.
    Chill HH, Cohen-Milun G, Cohen A, Moss NP, Winer JD, Shveiky D.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):784-790. PubMed ID: 35283321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture in Apical Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Pollack BL, Popiel P, Toaff MC, Drugge E, Bielawski A, Sacks A, Bibi M, Friedman-Ciment R, LeBron K, Alishahian L, Phillips D, Rubino SR, Pollack S, Khan RS, Khan ES, Pape DM, Grimes CL.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Feb 01; 141(2):268-283. PubMed ID: 36649334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Outcomes of Transvaginal High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension: Over 500-Patient Single-Center Study.
    Milani R, Frigerio M, Cola A, Beretta C, Spelzini F, Manodoro S.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb 01; 24(3):203-206. PubMed ID: 29697546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Recurrent apical prolapse after high uterosacral ligament suspension - in a heterogenous cohort characterised by a high prevalence of previous pelvic operations.
    Pedersen KD, Storkholm MH, Bek KM, Glavind-Kristensen M, Greisen S.
    BMC Womens Health; 2019 Jul 12; 19(1):96. PubMed ID: 31299946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Long-term outcomes and predictors of failure after surgery for stage IV apical pelvic organ prolapse.
    Linder BJ, El-Nashar SA, Mukwege AA, Weaver AL, McGree ME, Rhodes DJ, Gebhart JB, Klingele CJ, Occhino JA, Trabuco EC.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun 12; 29(6):803-810. PubMed ID: 28921036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Brubaker L, Norton P, Gantz M, Richter HE, Weidner A, Menefee S, Schaffer J, Pugh N, Meikle S, NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    JAMA; 2018 Apr 17; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.