These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


698 related items for PubMed ID: 21683539

  • 1. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research.
    Milewski MD, Smitaman E, Moukaddam H, Katz LD, Essig DA, Medvecky MJ, Haims AH.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 21683539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients.
    Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Peterfy CG, Zarlingo M, Feller JF, Bost FW, Belzer JP, Wischer TK, Genant HK.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10587150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prospective comparison of 3D FIESTA versus fat-suppressed 3D SPGR MRI in evaluating knee cartilage lesions.
    Li X, Yu C, Wu H, Daniel K, Hu D, Xia L, Pan C, Xu A, Hu J, Wang L, Peng W, Li F.
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 19748006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Diagnosis of acetabular labral tears: comparison of three-dimensional intermediate-weighted fast spin-echo MR arthrography with two-dimensional MR arthrography at 3.0 T.
    Park SY, Park JS, Jin W, Rhyu KH, Ryu KN.
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Feb 01; 54(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 23093725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy.
    Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG, Fuchs MD, Ratner LM, Wirth CR, Hospodar PP.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul 01; 167(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 8659356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
    Lee SY, Jee WH, Kim SK, Koh IJ, Kim JM.
    Acta Radiol; 2010 May 01; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of the Articular Cartilage of the Knee Joint Using an Isotropic Resolution 3D Fast Spin-Echo Sequence With Conventional and Radial Reformatted Images.
    Gustas CN, Blankenbaker DG, Rio AM, Winalski CS, Kijowski R.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug 01; 205(2):371-9. PubMed ID: 26204290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint.
    Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Davis KW, Shinki K, Kaplan LD, De Smet AA.
    Radiology; 2009 Mar 01; 250(3):839-48. PubMed ID: 19164121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Grading articular cartilage of the knee using fast spin-echo proton density-weighted MR imaging without fat suppression.
    Sonin AH, Pensy RA, Mulligan ME, Hatem S.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov 01; 179(5):1159-66. PubMed ID: 12388492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
    Welsch GH, Zak L, Mamisch TC, Resinger C, Marlovits S, Trattnig S.
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep 01; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Synthetic-echo time postprocessing technique for generating images with variable T2-weighted contrast: diagnosis of meniscal and cartilage abnormalities of the knee.
    Andreisek G, White LM, Theodoropoulos JS, Naraghi A, Young N, Zhao CY, Mamisch TC, Sussman MS.
    Radiology; 2010 Jan 01; 254(1):188-99. PubMed ID: 20032152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of cartilage surface injuries using 3D-double echo steady state (3D-DESS): effect of changing flip angle from 40° to 90°.
    Moriya S, Miki Y, Kanagaki M, Yamamoto A, Okudaira S, Nakamura S, Yokobayashi T, Ishikawa M.
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec 01; 52(10):1138-42. PubMed ID: 22042983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Knee derangements: comparison of isotropic 3D fast spin-echo, isotropic 3D balanced fast field-echo, and conventional 2D fast spin-echo MR imaging.
    Jung JY, Yoon YC, Kim HR, Choe BK, Wang JH, Jung JY.
    Radiology; 2013 Sep 01; 268(3):802-13. PubMed ID: 23533289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Diagnosis of articular cartilage abnormalities of the knee: prospective clinical evaluation of a 3D water-excitation true FISP sequence.
    Duc SR, Koch P, Schmid MR, Horger W, Hodler J, Pfirrmann CW.
    Radiology; 2007 May 01; 243(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 17400759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.