These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
193 related items for PubMed ID: 21684115
1. Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. Relevo R, Balshem H. J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1168-77. PubMed ID: 21684115 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program. Chou R, Aronson N, Atkins D, Ismaila AS, Santaguida P, Smith DH, Whitlock E, Wilt TJ, Moher D. J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):502-12. PubMed ID: 18823754 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. Atkins D, Chang SM, Gartlehner G, Buckley DI, Whitlock EP, Berliner E, Matchar D. J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1198-207. PubMed ID: 21463926 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. Fu R, Gartlehner G, Grant M, Shamliyan T, Sedrakyan A, Wilt TJ, Griffith L, Oremus M, Raina P, Ismaila A, Santaguida P, Lau J, Trikalinos TA. J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1187-97. PubMed ID: 21477993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. AHRQ series paper 1: comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program. Slutsky J, Atkins D, Chang S, Sharp BA. J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):481-3. PubMed ID: 18834715 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Observational studies in systematic [corrected] reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. Norris SL, Atkins D, Bruening W, Fox S, Johnson E, Kane R, Morton SC, Oremus M, Ospina M, Randhawa G, Schoelles K, Shekelle P, Viswanathan M. J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1178-86. PubMed ID: 21636246 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. AHRQ series paper 2: principles for developing guidance: AHRQ and the effective health-care program. Helfand M, Balshem H. J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):484-90. PubMed ID: 19716268 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) effective health care (EHC) program methods guide for comparative effectiveness reviews: keeping up-to-date in a rapidly evolving field. Chang SM. J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1166-7. PubMed ID: 21959053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Updating comparative effectiveness reviews: current efforts in AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program. Tsertsvadze A, Maglione M, Chou R, Garritty C, Coleman C, Lux L, Bass E, Balshem H, Moher D. J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1208-15. PubMed ID: 21684114 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L, Datta S, Smith HS, Hirsch JA. Pain Physician; 2009 Nov; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program. Whitlock EP, Lopez SA, Chang S, Helfand M, Eder M, Floyd N. J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):491-501. PubMed ID: 19540721 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions--agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program. Owens DK, Lohr KN, Atkins D, Treadwell JR, Reston JT, Bass EB, Chang S, Helfand M. J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):513-23. PubMed ID: 19595577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. AHRQ series commentary 3: the United States addresses comparative effectiveness but not cost-effectiveness through the effective health-care program. Freemantle N, Drummond MF. J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):479-80. PubMed ID: 20346862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. AHRQ series commentary 1: rating the evidence in comparative effectiveness reviews. Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann H, Guyatt G. J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):474-5. PubMed ID: 20189352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the impact of systematic reviews on future research: two case studies. Viswanathan M, Nerz P, Dalberth B, Voisin C, Lohr KN, Tant E, Jonas DE, Carey T. J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Jul; 1(4):329-46. PubMed ID: 24237467 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing equivalence and noninferiority. Treadwell JR, Uhl S, Tipton K, Shamliyan T, Viswanathan M, Berkman ND, Sun X, Coleman CI, Elshaug AG, Singh S, Wang SY, Ramakrishnan R. J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1144-9. PubMed ID: 22732455 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go? Ogilvie D, Hamilton V, Egan M, Petticrew M. J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Sep; 59(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 16100321 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews: is there room for improvement? Lui S, Smith EJ, Terplan M. Acupunct Med; 2010 Sep; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 20615852 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Databases for outcomes research: what has 10 years of experience taught us? Bosco L. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2001 Sep; 10(5):445-55. PubMed ID: 11802591 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. AHRQ series commentary 2: informative, timely, and valuable: an outsider view of the comparative effectiveness review articles. Tovey D. J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):476-8. PubMed ID: 20346861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]