These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

145 related items for PubMed ID: 21685066

  • 1. Construction of co-complex score matrix for protein complex prediction from AP-MS data.
    Xie Z, Kwoh CK, Li XL, Wu M.
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jul 01; 27(13):i159-66. PubMed ID: 21685066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A novel scoring approach for protein co-purification data reveals high interaction specificity.
    Yu X, Ivanic J, Wallqvist A, Reifman J.
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Sep 01; 5(9):e1000515. PubMed ID: 19779545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A sampling framework for incorporating quantitative mass spectrometry data in protein interaction analysis.
    Tucker G, Loh PR, Berger B.
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Oct 04; 14():299. PubMed ID: 24093595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Markov clustering versus affinity propagation for the partitioning of protein interaction graphs.
    Vlasblom J, Wodak SJ.
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Mar 30; 10():99. PubMed ID: 19331680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Popular computational methods to assess multiprotein complexes derived from label-free affinity purification and mass spectrometry (AP-MS) experiments.
    Armean IM, Lilley KS, Trotter MW.
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Jan 30; 12(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 23071097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. How and when should interactome-derived clusters be used to predict functional modules and protein function?
    Song J, Singh M.
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Dec 01; 25(23):3143-50. PubMed ID: 19770263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. From pull-down data to protein interaction networks and complexes with biological relevance.
    Zhang B, Park BH, Karpinets T, Samatova NF.
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr 01; 24(7):979-86. PubMed ID: 18304937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Protein complex prediction via dense subgraphs and false positive analysis.
    Hernandez C, Mella C, Navarro G, Olivera-Nappa A, Araya J.
    PLoS One; 2017 Apr 01; 12(9):e0183460. PubMed ID: 28937982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Protein Complex Detection via Effective Integration of Base Clustering Solutions and Co-Complex Affinity Scores.
    Wu M, Ou-Yang L, Li XL.
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2017 Apr 01; 14(3):733-739. PubMed ID: 27071190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A two-step framework for inferring direct protein-protein interaction network from AP-MS data.
    Tian B, Zhao C, Gu F, He Z.
    BMC Syst Biol; 2017 Sep 21; 11(Suppl 4):82. PubMed ID: 28950876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.