These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

273 related items for PubMed ID: 21685625

  • 61. Cognitive computer-based video analysis: its application in assessing the usability of medical systems.
    Kushniruk AW, Patel VL.
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 2():1566-9. PubMed ID: 8591502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 62. Information system design for a hospital emergency department: a usability analysis of software prototypes.
    Karahoca A, Bayraktar E, Tatoglu E, Karahoca D.
    J Biomed Inform; 2010 Apr; 43(2):224-32. PubMed ID: 19755173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 63. Continuous Video Recording of Electronic Health Record User Sessions to Support Usability and Safety.
    Wright A, Aaron S, Zuccotti G.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Aug 21; 264():1811-1812. PubMed ID: 31438356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 64. How will we know if it's working? A multi-faceted approach to measuring usability of a specialty-specific electronic medical record.
    Hollin I, Griffin M, Kachnowski S.
    Health Informatics J; 2012 Sep 21; 18(3):219-32. PubMed ID: 23011817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 65. Safer Design - Composable EHRs and Mechanisms for Safety.
    Senathirajah Y.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015 Sep 21; 218():86-92. PubMed ID: 26262532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 66. Integrating usability testing and think-aloud protocol analysis with "near-live" clinical simulations in evaluating clinical decision support.
    Li AC, Kannry JL, Kushniruk A, Chrimes D, McGinn TG, Edonyabo D, Mann DM.
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 Nov 21; 81(11):761-72. PubMed ID: 22456088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 67. Assessing and comparing the usability of Chinese EHRs used in two Peking University hospitals to EHRs used in the US: A method of RUA.
    Xu L, Wen D, Zhang X, Lei J.
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 May 21; 89():32-42. PubMed ID: 26980357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 68. [The design of smart data collection system for EHR].
    Li XY, Yan ZZ, Lv HJ.
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2009 Nov 21; 33(6):421-4. PubMed ID: 20352914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 69. Applying usability heuristics to radiotherapy systems.
    Chan AJ, Islam MK, Rosewall T, Jaffray DA, Easty AC, Cafazzo JA.
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan 21; 102(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 21733590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 70. Video Analysis and Remote Digital Ethnography: Approaches to understanding user perspectives and processes involving healthcare information technology.
    Kushniruk AW, Borycki EM.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015 Jan 21; 215():206-16. PubMed ID: 26249198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 71. Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors.
    Ratwani RM, Fairbanks RJ, Hettinger AZ, Benda NC.
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Nov 21; 22(6):1179-82. PubMed ID: 26049532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 72. Information accountability and usability: are there any connections?
    Sahama T, Kushniruk A, Kuwata S.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013 Nov 21; 183():145-50. PubMed ID: 23388272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 73. Navigation in the electronic health record: A review of the safety and usability literature.
    Roman LC, Ancker JS, Johnson SB, Senathirajah Y.
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Mar 21; 67():69-79. PubMed ID: 28088527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 74. Designing, implementing and evaluating e-prescription: a field study and comparison with PSIP results.
    Riccioli C, Cacciabue PC, Campanini M, Jung M.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011 Mar 21; 166():105-15. PubMed ID: 21685616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 75. Classification and prioritization of usability problems using an augmented classification scheme.
    Khajouei R, Peute LW, Hasman A, Jaspers MW.
    J Biomed Inform; 2011 Dec 21; 44(6):948-57. PubMed ID: 21782036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 76. A review of healthcare information system usability & safety.
    Minshall S.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013 Dec 21; 183():151-6. PubMed ID: 23388273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 77. Development of a Video Coding Scheme Focused on Socio-Technical Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction in Healthcare.
    Kushniruk A, Borycki E, Kitson N, Kannry J.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Dec 21; 257():236-243. PubMed ID: 30741202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 78. Comparing two anesthesia information management system user interfaces: a usability evaluation.
    Wanderer JP, Rao AV, Rothwell SH, Ehrenfeld JM.
    Can J Anaesth; 2012 Nov 21; 59(11):1023-31. PubMed ID: 23055030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 79. Realizing electronic medical record benefits: an easy-to-do usability study.
    Harrington L, Porch L, Acosta K, Wilkens K.
    J Nurs Adm; 2011 Nov 21; 41(7-8):331-5. PubMed ID: 21799365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 80. Low-Cost Rapid Usability Testing for health information systems: is it worth the effort?
    Baylis TB, Kushniruk AW, Borycki EM.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012 Nov 21; 180():363-7. PubMed ID: 22874213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.