These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
327 related items for PubMed ID: 21722064
21. Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention. Poole BJ, Kane MJ. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1430-54. PubMed ID: 19123118 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Binding and inhibition in working memory: individual and age differences in short-term recognition. Oberauer K. J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):368-87. PubMed ID: 16131269 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Aging, working memory, and discrimination learning. Mutter SA, Haggbloom SJ, Plumlee LF, Schirmer AR. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1556-66. PubMed ID: 16873108 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: an examination of differences in accessibility. Unsworth N, Spillers GJ, Brewer GA. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012 Sep; 65(12):2397-410. PubMed ID: 22800472 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The effectiveness of test-enhanced learning depends on trait test anxiety and working-memory capacity. Tse CS, Pu X. J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Sep; 18(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 22774786 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Errorless learning and working memory: the impact of errors, distractors, and memory span load on immediate recall in healthy adults. Nordvik JE, Schanke AK, Landro NI. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2011 Jun; 33(5):587-95. PubMed ID: 21298584 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Role of the basal ganglia in category learning: how do patients with Parkinson's disease learn? Shohamy D, Myers CE, Onlaor S, Gluck MA. Behav Neurosci; 2004 Aug; 118(4):676-86. PubMed ID: 15301595 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Variation in working memory capacity and cognitive control: goal maintenance and microadjustments of control. Unsworth N, Redick TS, Spillers GJ, Brewer GA. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012 Aug; 65(2):326-55. PubMed ID: 21851149 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Outcome maximality and additivity training also influence cue competition in causal learning when learning involves many cues and events. Vandorpe S, De Houwer J, Beckers T. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):356-68. PubMed ID: 17366305 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Positive and negative mediation as a function of whether the absent cue was previously associated with the outcome. Castro L, Matute H. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Dec; 63(12):2359-75. PubMed ID: 20603776 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Blocking of human causal learning involves learned changes in stimulus processing. Le Pelley ME, Beesley T, Suret MB. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1468-76. PubMed ID: 17853191 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Learned predictiveness effects in humans: a function of learning, performance, or both? Le Pelley ME, Suret MB, Beesley T. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):312-27. PubMed ID: 19594278 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Contingency bias in probability judgement may arise from ambiguity regarding additional causes. Mitchell CJ, Griffiths O, More P, Lovibond PF. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1675-86. PubMed ID: 23350876 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Working memory supports inference learning just like classification learning. Craig S, Lewandowsky S. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Aug; 66(8):1493-503. PubMed ID: 23931655 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: an interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model. White PA. Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):99-140. PubMed ID: 16095042 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Prior belief and polarity in multicue learning. Evans JS, Clibbens J, Harris A. Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 May; 58(4):651-65. PubMed ID: 16104100 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Working memory capacity predicts conflict-task performance. Gulbinaite R, Johnson A. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 May; 67(7):1383-400. PubMed ID: 24199908 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Individual differences in working memory capacity determine the effects of oculomotor task load on concurrent word recall performance. Lee EJ, Kwon G, Lee A, Ghajar J, Suh M. Brain Res; 2011 Jul 05; 1399():59-65. PubMed ID: 21645879 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]