These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


219 related items for PubMed ID: 21723773

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Physics-based scoring of protein-ligand interactions: explicit polarizability, quantum mechanics and free energies.
    Bryce RA.
    Future Med Chem; 2011 Apr; 3(6):683-98. PubMed ID: 21554075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Binding Free Energy Calculation Using Quantum Mechanics Aimed for Drug Lead Optimization.
    Cavasotto CN.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020 Apr; 2114():257-268. PubMed ID: 32016898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Toward High-Throughput Predictive Modeling of Protein Binding/Unbinding Kinetics.
    Chiu SH, Xie L.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun 27; 56(6):1164-74. PubMed ID: 27159844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Computational approach to de novo discovery of fragment binding for novel protein states.
    Konteatis ZD, Klon AE, Zou J, Meshkat S.
    Methods Enzymol; 2011 Jun 27; 493():357-80. PubMed ID: 21371598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Computational Methods Used in Hit-to-Lead and Lead Optimization Stages of Structure-Based Drug Discovery.
    Heifetz A, Southey M, Morao I, Townsend-Nicholson A, Bodkin MJ.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018 Jun 27; 1705():375-394. PubMed ID: 29188574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Dynamic Docking: A Paradigm Shift in Computational Drug Discovery.
    Gioia D, Bertazzo M, Recanatini M, Masetti M, Cavalli A.
    Molecules; 2017 Nov 22; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 29165360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Molecular Dynamics as a Tool for Virtual Ligand Screening.
    Menchon G, Maveyraud L, Czaplicki G.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018 Nov 22; 1762():145-178. PubMed ID: 29594772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. High-performance drug discovery: computational screening by combining docking and molecular dynamics simulations.
    Okimoto N, Futatsugi N, Fuji H, Suenaga A, Morimoto G, Yanai R, Ohno Y, Narumi T, Taiji M.
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Oct 22; 5(10):e1000528. PubMed ID: 19816553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Investigation of the differences in activity between hydroxycycloalkyl N1 substituted pyrazole derivatives as inhibitors of B-Raf kinase by using docking, molecular dynamics, QM/MM, and fragment-based de novo design: study of binding mode of diastereomer compounds.
    Caballero J, Alzate-Morales JH, Vergara-Jaque A.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov 28; 51(11):2920-31. PubMed ID: 22011048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding constants with the molecular dynamics free energy perturbation method.
    Woo HJ.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008 Nov 28; 443():109-20. PubMed ID: 18446284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations with FEP.
    Wang L, Chambers J, Abel R.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019 Nov 28; 2022():201-232. PubMed ID: 31396905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.