These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

162 related items for PubMed ID: 2173735

  • 1. Automated polymerase chain reaction for papillomavirus screening of cervicovaginal lavages: comparison with dot-blot hybridization in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic population.
    Morris BJ, Rose BR, Flanagan JL, McKinnon KJ, Loo CY, Thompson CH, Flampoulidou M, Ford RM, Hunter JC, Nightingale BN.
    J Med Virol; 1990 Sep; 32(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 2173735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Tampons: a novel patient-administered method for the assessment of genital human papillomavirus infection.
    Fairley CK, Chen S, Tabrizi SN, Quinn MA, McNeil JJ, Garland SM.
    J Infect Dis; 1992 Jun; 165(6):1103-6. PubMed ID: 1316411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prevalence of HPV cervical infection in a family planning clinic determined by polymerase chain reaction and dot blot hybridisation.
    Hallam N, Green J, Gibson P, Powis J, Bibby J.
    J Med Virol; 1991 Jul; 34(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 1919537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Time trends in the prevalence of human papillomavirus infections in archival Papanicolaou smears: analysis by cytology, DNA hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction.
    Rakoczy P, Sterrett G, Kulski J, Whitaker D, Hutchinson L, MacKenzie J, Pixley E.
    J Med Virol; 1990 Sep; 32(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 2173733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Molecular diagnosis of genital human papillomavirus infection: comparison of two methods used to collect exfoliated cervical cells.
    Vermund SH, Schiffman MH, Goldberg GL, Ritter DB, Weltman A, Burk RD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Feb; 160(2):304-8. PubMed ID: 2537011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of Southern blot hybridization and polymerase chain reaction methods for the detection of human papillomavirus DNA.
    Schiffman MH, Bauer HM, Lorincz AT, Manos MM, Byrne JC, Glass AG, Cadell DM, Howley PM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Mar; 29(3):573-7. PubMed ID: 1645370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Polymerase chain reaction. A sensitive indicator of the prevalence of human papillomavirus DNA in a population with sexually transmitted disease.
    Borg AJ, Medley G, Garland SM.
    Acta Cytol; 1995 Mar; 39(4):654-8. PubMed ID: 7631538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Detection of human papillomavirus DNA by the nucleic acid sandwich hybridization method from cervical scraping.
    Parkkinen S, Mäntyjärvi R, Syrjänen K, Ranki M.
    J Med Virol; 1986 Nov; 20(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 3023542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Variability of human papillomavirus DNA testing in a longitudinal cohort of young women.
    Moscicki AB, Palefsky J, Smith G, Siboshski S, Schoolnik G.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):578-85. PubMed ID: 8397358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of Southern transfer hybridization and dot filter hybridization for detection of cervical human papillomavirus infection with types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35.
    Kiviat NB, Koutsky LA, Critchlow CW, Galloway DA, Vernon DA, Peterson ML, McElhose PE, Pendras SJ, Stevens CE, Holmes KK.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Nov; 94(5):561-5. PubMed ID: 2173397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Detection and typing of human papillomavirus using the Vira Type "in situ" kit: comparison with a conventional dot blot technique.
    Faulkner-Jones BE, Bellomarino VM, Borg AJ, Orzeszko K, Garland SM.
    J Clin Pathol; 1990 Nov; 43(11):913-7. PubMed ID: 2175755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Detection of human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid in exfoliated cervicovaginal cells as a predictor of cervical neoplasia in a high-risk population.
    Ritter DB, Kadish AS, Vermund SH, Romney SL, Villari D, Burk RD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Dec; 159(6):1517-25. PubMed ID: 2849881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Human papillomavirus infection of the cervix detected by cervicovaginal lavage and molecular hybridization: correlation with biopsy results and Papanicolaou smear.
    Burk RD, Kadish AS, Calderin S, Romney SL.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 May; 154(5):982-9. PubMed ID: 3010725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison between vaginal tampon and cervicovaginal lavage specimen collection for detection of human papillomavirus DNA by the polymerase chain reaction. The Canadian Women's HIV Study Group.
    Coutlée F, Hankins C, Lapointe N.
    J Med Virol; 1997 Jan; 51(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 8986948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.