These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

141 related items for PubMed ID: 21752081

  • 1. Getting the questions right: non-compound questions are more reliable than compound questions on matched multi-source feedback instruments.
    Mackillop L, Parker-Swift J, Crossley J.
    Med Educ; 2011 Aug; 45(8):843-8. PubMed ID: 21752081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Multisource feedback in evaluating the performance of doctors: the example of the UK General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Wright C, Richards SH, Hill JJ, Roberts MJ, Norman GR, Greco M, Taylor MR, Campbell JL.
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1668-78. PubMed ID: 23095930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. What is a good general practitioner (GP)? The development and evaluation of a multi-source feedback instrument for GP appraisal.
    Shepherd A, Lough M.
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 May; 21(3):149-64. PubMed ID: 20515544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The reliability of multisource feedback in competency-based assessment programs: the effects of multiple occasions and assessor groups.
    Moonen-van Loon JM, Overeem K, Govaerts MJ, Verhoeven BH, van der Vleuten CP, Driessen EW.
    Acad Med; 2015 Aug; 90(8):1093-9. PubMed ID: 25993283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Campbell JL, Richards SH, Dickens A, Greco M, Narayanan A, Brearley S.
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Jun; 17(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 18519625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of physicians' professional performance: an iterative development and validation study of multisource feedback instruments.
    Overeem K, Wollersheim HC, Arah OA, Cruijsberg JK, Grol RP, Lombarts KM.
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Mar 26; 12():80. PubMed ID: 22448816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Can student self-ratings be compared with peer ratings? A study of measurement invariance of multisource feedback.
    Lee KL, Tsai SL, Chiu YT, Ho MJ.
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 May 26; 21(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 26387118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Specialty-specific multi-source feedback: assuring validity, informing training.
    Davies H, Archer J, Bateman A, Dewar S, Crossley J, Grant J, Southgate L.
    Med Educ; 2008 Oct 26; 42(10):1014-20. PubMed ID: 18823521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies.
    Lockyer J.
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2003 Oct 26; 23(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 12739254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Validation of a multi-source feedback tool for use in general practice.
    Campbell J, Narayanan A, Burford B, Greco M.
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 May 26; 21(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 20515545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.