These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

443 related items for PubMed ID: 21752510

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Ribeiro-Junior PD, Magro-Filho O, Shastri KA, Papageorge MB.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
    Van Sickels JE, Peterson GP, Holms S, Haug RH.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparative biomechanical and photoelastic evaluation of different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.
    Sato FR, Asprino L, Consani S, de Moraes M.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 68(1):160-6. PubMed ID: 20006171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY, Hong J, Kim CS, Kim MJ.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis.
    Sato FR, Asprino L, Noritomi PY, da Silva JV, de Moraes M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(8):934-41. PubMed ID: 22510341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of modified plating techniques for bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.
    Sener I, Arıcı S, Bereket C, Tek M.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1573-6. PubMed ID: 22976664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method.
    Sarkarat F, Motamedi MH, Bohluli B, Moharamnejad N, Ansari S, Shahabi-Sirjani H.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparative evaluation of the hybrid technique for fixation of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement by mechanical, photoelastic, and finite element analysis.
    Sato FR, Asprino L, Consani S, Noritomi PY, de Moraes M.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Nov; 114(5 Suppl):S60-8. PubMed ID: 23083958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgery-posterior loading.
    Erkmen E, Simşek B, Yücel E, Kurt A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 16053877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.