These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


740 related items for PubMed ID: 21756458

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Hearing preservation via a cochleostomy approach and deep insertion of a standard length cochlear implant electrode.
    Bruce IA, Bates JE, Melling C, Mawman D, Green KM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Dec; 32(9):1444-7. PubMed ID: 22089957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Hearing preservation outcomes with different cochlear implant electrodes: Nucleus® Hybrid™-L24 and Nucleus Freedom™ CI422.
    Jurawitz MC, Büchner A, Harpel T, Schüssler M, Majdani O, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Lenarz T.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014 Dec; 19(5):293-309. PubMed ID: 25277083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evolution of electrode array diameter for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation.
    Nguyen Y, Mosnier I, Borel S, Ambert-Dahan E, Bouccara D, Bozorg-Grayeli A, Ferrary E, Sterkers O.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 133(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 23216055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. An evaluation of the preservation of residual hearing with the Nucleus Contour Advance electrode.
    Garcia-Ibanez L, Macias AR, Morera C, Rodriguez MM, Szyfter W, Skarszynski H, Emamdjomeh H, Baumgartner WD.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Jun; 129(6):651-64. PubMed ID: 18752086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [The influence of insertion depth on the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation].
    Neumann M, Aschendorff A, Schipper J, Laszig R, Klenzner T.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Feb; 84(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 15712047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Residual hearing thresholds in cochlear implantation and reimplantation.
    Di Nardo W, Cantore I, Cianfrone F, Melillo P, Rigante M, Paludetti G.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007 Feb; 12(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 17259703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA, Black JM, Koch DB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 37.