These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

314 related items for PubMed ID: 21765388

  • 1. Clip vibroplasty: experimental evaluation and first clinical results.
    Hüttenbrink KB, Beutner D, Bornitz M, Luers JC, Zahnert T.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):650-3. PubMed ID: 21765388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Electrocochleography in round window Vibrant Soundbridge implantation.
    Colletti V, Mandalà M, Colletti L.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Apr; 146(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 22140205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Reinforced active middle ear implant fixation in incus vibroplasty.
    Mlynski R, Dalhoff E, Heyd A, Wildenstein D, Hagen R, Gummer AW, Schraven SP.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25099400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
    Streitberger C, Perotti M, Beltrame MA, Giarbini N.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009 Jan; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Treatment of the atretic ear with round window vibrant soundbridge implantation in infants and children: electrocochleography and audiologic outcomes.
    Mandalà M, Colletti L, Colletti V.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1250-5. PubMed ID: 21897320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Oval window membrane vibroplasty for direct acoustic cochlear stimulation: treating severe mixed hearing loss in challenging middle ears.
    Schwab B, Salcher RB, Maier H, Kontorinis G.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):804-9. PubMed ID: 22699990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.
    Vyskocil E, Riss D, Honeder C, Arnoldner C, Hamzavi JS, Baumgartner WD, Flak S, Gstoettner W.
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 24338550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Functional results of Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implants in conductive and mixed hearing losses.
    Bernardeschi D, Hoffman C, Benchaa T, Labassi S, Beliaeff M, Sterkers O, Grayeli AB.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2011 Jun; 16(6):381-7. PubMed ID: 21228566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window.
    Lee JM, Jung J, Moon IS, Kim SH, Choi JY.
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 27560038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Partial ossicular reconstruction: comparison of three different prostheses in clinical and experimental studies.
    Neudert M, Zahnert T, Lasurashvili N, Bornitz M, Lavcheva Z, Offergeld C.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 19174710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. TORP-vibroplasty: a new alternative for the chronically disabled middle ear.
    Hüttenbrink KB, Zahnert T, Bornitz M, Beutner D.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Oct; 29(7):965-71. PubMed ID: 18818544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of Alternative Coupling Methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge Floating Mass Transducer.
    Busch S, Lenarz T, Maier H.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016 Oct; 21(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 28068651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Experience with vibroplasty couplers at the stapes head and footplate.
    Beleites T, Neudert M, Beutner D, Hüttenbrink KB, Zahnert T.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Dec; 32(9):1468-72. PubMed ID: 22072259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A new implantable middle ear hearing device for mixed hearing loss: A feasibility study in human temporal bones.
    Huber AM, Ball GR, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Bodmer D, Sequeira D.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1104-9. PubMed ID: 17031322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [The active middle ear implant for the rehabilitation of sensorineural, mixed and conductive hearing losses].
    Sprinzl GM, Wolf-Magele A, Schnabl J, Koci V.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Sep; 90(9):560-72. PubMed ID: 21913153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: long-term follow-up.
    Henseler MA, Polanski JF, Schlegel C, Linder T.
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):437-41. PubMed ID: 24492140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A new vibroplasty coupling technique as a treatment for conductive and mixed hearing losses: a report of 4 cases.
    Huber AM, Mlynski R, Müller J, Dillier N, Holzmann D, Wolframm MD, Hagen R.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):613-7. PubMed ID: 22429947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Long-term outcome of round window Vibrant SoundBridge implantation in extensive ossicular chain defects.
    Colletti L, Mandalà M, Colletti V.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jul; 149(1):134-41. PubMed ID: 23585147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Impact of floating mass transducer coupling and positioning in round window vibroplasty.
    Rajan GP, Lampacher P, Ambett R, Dittrich G, Kuthubutheen J, Wood B, McArthur A, Marino R.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Feb; 32(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 21206391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Long-Term Outcomes of Vibroplasty Coupler Implantations to Treat Mixed/Conductive Hearing Loss.
    Zahnert T, Mlynski R, Löwenheim H, Beutner D, Hagen R, Ernst A, Zehlicke T, Kühne H, Friese N, Tropitzsch A, Luers JC, Todt I, Hüttenbrink KB.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018 Feb; 23(6):316-325. PubMed ID: 30650421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.