These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

211 related items for PubMed ID: 21766753

  • 1. Instruments for assisted vaginal delivery.
    Kripke C.
    Am Fam Physician; 2011 Jul 01; 84(1):26-7. PubMed ID: 21766753
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Forceps verses vacuum extraction: no, forceps AND vacuum extraction!].
    Marpeau L.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Dec 01; 34(12):1208. PubMed ID: 17127090
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup.
    Williams MC, Knuppel RA, O'Brien WF, Weiss A, Kanarek KS.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov 01; 78(5 Pt 1):789-94. PubMed ID: 1923198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Neonatal acid-base balance in spontaneous and instrumental vaginal deliveries.
    Livnat EJ, Fejgin M, Scommegna A, Bieniarz J, Burd L.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Nov 01; 52(5):549-51. PubMed ID: 31586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of sequential instruments at operative vaginal delivery.
    Murphy DJ, Macleod M, Bahl R, Strachan B.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 May 01; 156(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 21277670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Trends in operative vaginal delivery rates and associated maternal complication rates in an inner-city hospital.
    Kabiru WN, Jamieson D, Graves W, Lindsay M.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May 01; 184(6):1112-4. PubMed ID: 11349172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
    Anate M.
    West Afr J Med; 1991 May 01; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps.
    Lurie S, Glezerman M, Baider C, Sadan O.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Apr 01; 274(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 16408184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Operative vaginal delivery at Port Moresby General Hospital from 1977 to 2010.
    Mola GD, Kuk J.
    P N G Med J; 2011 Apr 01; 54(3-4):174-84. PubMed ID: 24494514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS, Premaratne S.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul 01; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. An audit of forceps delivery in Trinidad.
    Roopnarinesingh A, Knowles R.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 May 01; 22(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 12521496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Forceps delivery or vacuum extraction: no, forceps AND vacuum extraction!].
    Schaal JP.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan 01; 35(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 17208497
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.