These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1204 related items for PubMed ID: 21785299
1. Preoperative evaluation of the cervical spondylotic myelopathy with flexion-extension magnetic resonance imaging: about a prospective study of fifty patients. Zhang L, Zeitoun D, Rangel A, Lazennec JY, Catonné Y, Pascal-Moussellard H. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug 01; 36(17):E1134-9. PubMed ID: 21785299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic evaluation of the spinal cord in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy using a kinematic magnetic resonance imaging technique. Miura J, Doita M, Miyata K, Marui T, Nishida K, Fujii M, Kurosaka M. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Feb 01; 22(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 19190428 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of spinal cord compression and hyperintense intramedullary lesions on T2-weighted sequences in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy using flexion-extension MRI protocol. Zeitoun D, El Hajj F, Sariali E, Catonné Y, Pascal-Moussellard H. Spine J; 2015 Apr 01; 15(4):668-74. PubMed ID: 25485484 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of prognostic value of different MRI classifications of signal intensity change in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Avadhani A, Rajasekaran S, Shetty AP. Spine J; 2010 Jun 01; 10(6):475-85. PubMed ID: 20494809 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Relationship of dynamic cord impingement with disease severity and prognosis in cervical spondylotic myelopathy]. Wang LF, Shen Y, Zhang YZ, Xu JX, Ding WY, Cao JM. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Nov 10; 89(41):2883-7. PubMed ID: 20137642 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome. Houten JK, Cooper PR. Neurosurgery; 2003 May 10; 52(5):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 12699550 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical extension magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Kim CH, Chung CK, Kim KJ, Park SB, Lee SJ, Yoon SH, Park BJ. Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2014 Feb 10; 156(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 24287683 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of magnetic resonance imaging signal changes and outcome prediction after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Vedantam A, Jonathan A, Rajshekhar V. J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Dec 10; 15(6):660-6. PubMed ID: 21923236 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk factors for missed dynamic canal stenosis in the cervical spine. Hayashi T, Wang JC, Suzuki A, Takahashi S, Scott TP, Phan K, Lord EL, Ruangchainikom M, Shiba K, Daubs MD. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May 01; 39(10):812-9. PubMed ID: 24583725 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]