These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


330 related items for PubMed ID: 21787869

  • 21. A link between individual differences in multisensory speech perception and eye movements.
    Gurler D, Doyle N, Walker E, Magnotti J, Beauchamp M.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1333-41. PubMed ID: 25810157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. "Paying" attention to audiovisual speech: Do incongruent stimuli incur greater costs?
    Brown VA, Strand JF.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1743-1756. PubMed ID: 31197661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Age-related hearing loss influences functional connectivity of auditory cortex for the McGurk illusion.
    Rosemann S, Smith D, Dewenter M, Thiel CM.
    Cortex; 2020 Aug; 129():266-280. PubMed ID: 32535378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Variability and stability in the McGurk effect: contributions of participants, stimuli, time, and response type.
    Mallick DB, Magnotti JF, Beauchamp MS.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1299-307. PubMed ID: 25802068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Brain activation during audiovisual exposure anticipates future perception of ambiguous speech.
    Kilian-Hütten N, Vroomen J, Formisano E.
    Neuroimage; 2011 Aug 15; 57(4):1601-7. PubMed ID: 21664279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Spatio-temporal distribution of brain activity associated with audio-visually congruent and incongruent speech and the McGurk Effect.
    Pratt H, Bleich N, Mittelman N.
    Brain Behav; 2015 Nov 15; 5(11):e00407. PubMed ID: 26664791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Bayesian binding and fusion models explain illusion and enhancement effects in audiovisual speech perception.
    Lindborg A, Andersen TS.
    PLoS One; 2021 Nov 15; 16(2):e0246986. PubMed ID: 33606815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Audiovisual speech integration does not rely on the motor system: evidence from articulatory suppression, the McGurk effect, and fMRI.
    Matchin W, Groulx K, Hickok G.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar 15; 26(3):606-20. PubMed ID: 24236768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Weak observer-level correlation and strong stimulus-level correlation between the McGurk effect and audiovisual speech-in-noise: A causal inference explanation.
    Magnotti JF, Dzeda KB, Wegner-Clemens K, Rennig J, Beauchamp MS.
    Cortex; 2020 Dec 15; 133():371-383. PubMed ID: 33221701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Evidence for a Causal Dissociation of the McGurk Effect and Congruent Audiovisual Speech Perception via TMS.
    Ahn E, Majumdar A, Lee T, Brang D.
    bioRxiv; 2023 Nov 27. PubMed ID: 38077093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
    Shahin AJ, Backer KC, Rosenblum LD, Kerlin JR.
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb 14; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Rethinking the McGurk effect as a perceptual illusion.
    Getz LM, Toscano JC.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug 14; 83(6):2583-2598. PubMed ID: 33884572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Spatiotemporal dynamics of audiovisual speech processing.
    Bernstein LE, Auer ET, Wagner M, Ponton CW.
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan 01; 39(1):423-35. PubMed ID: 17920933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The Impact of Singing on Visual and Multisensory Speech Perception in Children on the Autism Spectrum.
    Feldman JI, Tu A, Conrad JG, Kuang W, Santapuram P, Woynaroski TG.
    Multisens Res; 2022 Dec 30; 36(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 36731528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Developmental Trajectory of McGurk Effect Susceptibility in Children and Adults With Amblyopia.
    Narinesingh C, Goltz HC, Raashid RA, Wong AM.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Mar 05; 56(3):2107-13. PubMed ID: 25744982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. On the variability of the McGurk effect: audiovisual integration depends on prestimulus brain states.
    Keil J, Müller N, Ihssen N, Weisz N.
    Cereb Cortex; 2012 Jan 05; 22(1):221-31. PubMed ID: 21625011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Speech-specific audiovisual integration modulates induced theta-band oscillations.
    Lindborg A, Baart M, Stekelenburg JJ, Vroomen J, Andersen TS.
    PLoS One; 2019 Jan 05; 14(7):e0219744. PubMed ID: 31310616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Different neural networks are involved in audiovisual speech perception depending on the context.
    Malfait N, Fonlupt P, Centelles L, Nazarian B, Brown LE, Caclin A.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Jul 05; 26(7):1572-86. PubMed ID: 24392896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.