These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

346 related items for PubMed ID: 21821017

  • 1. Molecular dissection of cis-regulatory modules at the Drosophila bithorax complex reveals critical transcription factor signature motifs.
    Starr MO, Ho MC, Gunther EJ, Tu YK, Shur AS, Goetz SE, Borok MJ, Kang V, Drewell RA.
    Dev Biol; 2011 Nov 15; 359(2):290-302. PubMed ID: 21821017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Functional evolution of cis-regulatory modules at a homeotic gene in Drosophila.
    Ho MC, Johnsen H, Goetz SE, Schiller BJ, Bae E, Tran DA, Shur AS, Allen JM, Rau C, Bender W, Fisher WW, Celniker SE, Drewell RA.
    PLoS Genet; 2009 Nov 15; 5(11):e1000709. PubMed ID: 19893611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: rules governing conservation and change.
    Ludwig MZ, Patel NH, Kreitman M.
    Development; 1998 Mar 15; 125(5):949-58. PubMed ID: 9449677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Deciphering the combinatorial architecture of a Drosophila homeotic gene enhancer.
    Drewell RA, Nevarez MJ, Kurata JS, Winkler LN, Li L, Dresch JM.
    Mech Dev; 2014 Feb 15; 131():68-77. PubMed ID: 24514265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A Hox Transcription Factor Collective Binds a Highly Conserved Distal-less cis-Regulatory Module to Generate Robust Transcriptional Outcomes.
    Uhl JD, Zandvakili A, Gebelein B.
    PLoS Genet; 2016 Apr 15; 12(4):e1005981. PubMed ID: 27058369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The abdominal-B promoter tethering element mediates promoter-enhancer specificity at the Drosophila bithorax complex.
    Akbari OS, Schiller BJ, Goetz SE, Ho MC, Bae E, Drewell RA.
    Fly (Austin); 2007 Apr 15; 1(6):337-9. PubMed ID: 18504507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Computational identification of developmental enhancers: conservation and function of transcription factor binding-site clusters in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Berman BP, Pfeiffer BD, Laverty TR, Salzberg SL, Rubin GM, Eisen MB, Celniker SE.
    Genome Biol; 2004 Apr 15; 5(9):R61. PubMed ID: 15345045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A novel promoter-tethering element regulates enhancer-driven gene expression at the bithorax complex in the Drosophila embryo.
    Akbari OS, Bae E, Johnsen H, Villaluz A, Wong D, Drewell RA.
    Development; 2008 Jan 15; 135(1):123-31. PubMed ID: 18045839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Conservation of enhancer location in divergent insects.
    Cande J, Goltsev Y, Levine MS.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Aug 25; 106(34):14414-9. PubMed ID: 19666595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evolution of developmental genes: molecular microevolution of enhancer sequences at the Ubx locus in Drosophila and its impact on developmental phenotypes.
    Phinchongsakuldit J, MacArthur S, Brookfield JF.
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Feb 25; 21(2):348-63. PubMed ID: 14660693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The cis-regulatory logic underlying abdominal Hox-mediated repression versus activation of regulatory elements in Drosophila.
    Zandvakili A, Uhl JD, Campbell I, Salomone J, Song YC, Gebelein B.
    Dev Biol; 2019 Jan 15; 445(2):226-236. PubMed ID: 30468713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Unraveling cis-regulatory mechanisms at the abdominal-A and Abdominal-B genes in the Drosophila bithorax complex.
    Akbari OS, Bousum A, Bae E, Drewell RA.
    Dev Biol; 2006 May 15; 293(2):294-304. PubMed ID: 16545794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Synthetic enhancer design by in silico compensatory evolution reveals flexibility and constraint in cis-regulation.
    Barr KA, Martinez C, Moran JR, Kim AR, Ramos AF, Reinitz J.
    BMC Syst Biol; 2017 Nov 29; 11(1):116. PubMed ID: 29187214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Contribution of distinct homeodomain DNA binding specificities to Drosophila embryonic mesodermal cell-specific gene expression programs.
    Busser BW, Gisselbrecht SS, Shokri L, Tansey TR, Gamble CE, Bulyk ML, Michelson AM.
    PLoS One; 2013 Nov 29; 8(7):e69385. PubMed ID: 23922708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Extraction of functional binding sites from unique regulatory regions: the Drosophila early developmental enhancers.
    Papatsenko DA, Makeev VJ, Lifanov AP, Régnier M, Nazina AG, Desplan C.
    Genome Res; 2002 Mar 29; 12(3):470-81. PubMed ID: 11875036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Sepsid even-skipped enhancers are functionally conserved in Drosophila despite lack of sequence conservation.
    Hare EE, Peterson BK, Iyer VN, Meier R, Eisen MB.
    PLoS Genet; 2008 Jun 27; 4(6):e1000106. PubMed ID: 18584029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. CRISPR/Cas9 and FLP-FRT mediated regulatory dissection of the BX-C of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Hajirnis N, Pandey S, Mishra RK.
    Chromosome Res; 2023 Jan 31; 31(1):7. PubMed ID: 36719476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Homeotic response elements are tightly linked to tissue-specific elements in a transcriptional enhancer of the teashirt gene.
    McCormick A, Coré N, Kerridge S, Scott MP.
    Development; 1995 Sep 31; 121(9):2799-812. PubMed ID: 7555708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evolved Repression Overcomes Enhancer Robustness.
    Preger-Ben Noon E, Davis FP, Stern DL.
    Dev Cell; 2016 Dec 05; 39(5):572-584. PubMed ID: 27840106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evolutionary mirages: selection on binding site composition creates the illusion of conserved grammars in Drosophila enhancers.
    Lusk RW, Eisen MB.
    PLoS Genet; 2010 Jan 22; 6(1):e1000829. PubMed ID: 20107516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.