These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

93 related items for PubMed ID: 21838148

  • 1. [Predictors of combined hormone contraception choice between Czech and Slovak women].
    Fait T.
    Ceska Gynekol; 2011 Jun; 76(3):190-3. PubMed ID: 21838148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Importance of the consultation for combined hormonal contraception's choice--results of CHOICE project in Czech and Slovak Republic].
    Fait T, Apetauer I.
    Ceska Gynekol; 2011 Apr; 76(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 21649999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Impact of a women's counselling programme on combined hormonal contraception in Portugal--the IMAGINE Study.
    Costa AR, Palma F, Sá JL, Vicente L, Bombas T, Nogueira AM, Rocha P.
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2011 Dec; 16(6):409-17. PubMed ID: 21942578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Broad counseling for adolescents about combined hormonal contraceptive methods: the choice study.
    Merki-Feld GS, Gruber IM.
    J Adolesc Health; 2014 Apr; 54(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 23932259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effect of adverse information and positive promotion on women's preferences for prescribed contraceptive products.
    Knox SA, Viney RC, Gu Y, Hole AR, Fiebig DG, Street DJ, Haas MR, Weisberg E, Bateson D.
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Apr; 83():70-80. PubMed ID: 23351426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Observational, prospective, multicentre study to evaluate the effects of counselling on the choice of combined hormonal contraceptives in Italy--the ECOS (Educational COunselling effectS) study.
    Gambera A, Corda F, Papa R, Bastianelli C, Bucciantini S, Dessole S, Scagliola P, Bernardini N, de Feo D, Beligotti F.
    BMC Womens Health; 2015 Sep 02; 15():69. PubMed ID: 26329464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Choice of contraceptives.
    Med Lett Drugs Ther; 2015 Sep 14; 57(1477):127-32. PubMed ID: 26353044
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Factors influencing women's preference to select a combined hormonal contraceptive method: a cross-sectional survey in Lithuania.
    Čepulienė R, Sveikatienė R, Gutauskas K, Vanagienė V.
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2012 Sep 14; 48(8):424-30. PubMed ID: 23128463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Impact of standardized information provided by gynecologists on women's choice of combined hormonal contraception.
    Machado RB, Pompei LM, Giribela A, de Melo NR.
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2013 Sep 14; 29(9):855-8. PubMed ID: 23802562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Vaginal combined contraception NuvaRing in the clinical practice in the Czech Republic].
    Fait T.
    Ceska Gynekol; 2009 Aug 14; 74(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 20564984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Impact of contraception counseling on choice of combined hormonal methods in Colombia].
    Gómez Sánchez P, Lozano F, Velásquez A, Marrugo M, Torres L.
    Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2015 Jun 14; 37(6):395-401. PubMed ID: 26245174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The CHOICE study: effect of counselling on the selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods in 11 countries.
    Bitzer J, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Roumen F, Marintcheva-Petrova M, van Bakel B, Oddens BJ.
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2012 Feb 14; 17(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 22239264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Provision of contraception: a survey among primary care physicians in Finland.
    Sannisto T, Kosunen E.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May 14; 89(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 20423277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Factors influencing women's selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods after counselling in 11 countries: results from a subanalysis of the CHOICE study.
    Bitzer J, Cupanik V, Fait T, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Grob P, Oddens BJ, Pawelczyk L, Unzeitig V.
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2013 Oct 14; 18(5):372-80. PubMed ID: 23941311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The transdermal patch and the vaginal ring: two novel methods of combined hormonal contraception.
    Swica Y.
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2007 Mar 14; 34(1):31-42, viii. PubMed ID: 17472863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Choice of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device, etonogestrel implant or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception after aspiration abortion.
    Steinauer JE, Upadhyay UD, Sokoloff A, Harper CC, Diedrich JT, Drey EA.
    Contraception; 2015 Dec 14; 92(6):553-9. PubMed ID: 26093190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Long-acting reversible contraception.
    Peck SA.
    Nurs Womens Health; 2013 Oct 14; 17(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 24138662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.