These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

315 related items for PubMed ID: 21841983

  • 1. Interfacial shear strength of endosseous implants.
    Butz F, Ogawa T, Nishimura I.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):746-51. PubMed ID: 21841983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
    Lin A, Wang CJ, Kelly J, Gubbi P, Nishimura I.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Vitamin D and bone physiology: demonstration of vitamin D deficiency in an implant osseointegration rat model.
    Kelly J, Lin A, Wang CJ, Park S, Nishimura I.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 19486459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Rate of pull-out strength gain of dual-etched titanium implants: a comparative study in rabbits.
    Baker D, London RM, O'Neal R.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999 Aug; 14(5):722-8. PubMed ID: 10531744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, Steinhauser E, Kniha H, Erhardt W.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A human histologic analysis of osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces.
    Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinstein RL.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1999 Apr; 19(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 10635177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of ultraviolet photoactivation of titanium on osseointegration in a rat model.
    Ueno T, Yamada M, Hori N, Suzuki T, Ogawa T.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Apr; 25(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 20369086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Biomechanical and histological behavior of zirconia implants: an experiment in the rat.
    Kohal RJ, Wolkewitz M, Hinze M, Han JS, Bächle M, Butz F.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 19298287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit.
    Klokkevold PR, Johnson P, Dadgostari S, Caputo A, Davies JE, Nishimura RD.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Aug; 12(4):350-7. PubMed ID: 11488864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
    Strnad J, Urban K, Povysil C, Strnad Z.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Aug; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of supramicron roughness characteristics produced by 1- and 2-step acid etching on the osseointegration capability of titanium.
    Att W, Tsukimura N, Suzuki T, Ogawa T.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Aug; 22(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 17974105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Bone response to modified titanium surface implants in nonhuman primates (Papio ursinus) and humans: histological evaluation.
    Mangano C, Perrotti V, Iezzi G, Scarano A, Mangano F, Piattelli A.
    J Oral Implantol; 2008 Aug; 34(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 18390239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Anodization increases early integration of Osstem implants in sheep femurs.
    Duncan WJ, Lee MH, Dovban AS, Hendra N, Ershadi S, Rumende H.
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2008 Jun; 19():152-6. PubMed ID: 22073469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Sandblasted and acid-etched dental implants: a histologic study in rats.
    Marinho VC, Celletti R, Bracchetti G, Petrone G, Minkin C, Piattelli A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003 Jun; 18(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 12608672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Early-stage osseointegration capability of a submicrofeatured titanium surface created by microroughening and anodic oxidation.
    Yamada M, Ueno T, Minamikawa H, Ikeda T, Nakagawa K, Ogawa T.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Sep; 24(9):991-1001. PubMed ID: 22726210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of dehiscences to the bone response of implants with an Acid-etched surface: an experimental study in miniature pigs.
    Ruehe B, Heberer S, Bayreuther K, Nelson K.
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Sep; 37(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 20557147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model.
    Abron A, Hopfensperger M, Thompson J, Cooper LF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 11174677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
    Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Piattelli A, Scarano A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000 Jan; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Bone-implant contact on machined and dual acid-etched surfaces after 2 months of healing in the human maxilla.
    Trisi P, Lazzara R, Rebaudi A, Rao W, Testori T, Porter SS.
    J Periodontol; 2003 Jul; 74(7):945-56. PubMed ID: 12931756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Modulated bone matrix-related gene expression is associated with differences in interfacial strength of different implant surface roughness.
    Ogawa T, Sukotjo C, Nishimura I.
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Dec; 11(4):241-7. PubMed ID: 12501137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.