These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

392 related items for PubMed ID: 21841996

  • 21. Accuracy of a cone beam computed tomography-guided surgical stent for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
    Yu JJ, Kim GT, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Paek J, Kim SH, Huang JC.
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Mar; 82(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 21875317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Virtually fabricated guide for placement of the C-tube miniplate.
    Paek J, Jeong DM, Kim Y, Kim SH, Chung KR, Nelson G.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):694-702. PubMed ID: 24785934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.
    Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19138616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Biomechanical anchorage evaluation of mini-implants treated with sandblasting and acid etching in orthodontics.
    Calderón JH, Valencia RM, Casasa AA, Sánchez MA, Espinosa R, Ceja I.
    Implant Dent; 2011 Aug; 20(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 21785362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A comparative study between currently used methods and Small Volume-Cone Beam Tomography for surgical placement of mini implants.
    Landin M, Jadhav A, Yadav S, Tadinada A.
    Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 25343688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. How palatal vault morphology and screw length influence the accuracy of dynamic computer-guided orthodontic miniscrew insertion. A prospective clinical study.
    Brilli D, Cauli I, Cassetta M.
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105093. PubMed ID: 38788916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Point-to-point registration with mandibulo-maxillary splint in open and closed jaw position. Evaluation of registration accuracy for computer-aided surgery of the mandible.
    Bettschart C, Kruse A, Matthews F, Zemann W, Obwegeser JA, Grätz KW, Lübbers HT.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 40(7):592-8. PubMed ID: 22079336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study.
    Kalra S, Tripathi T, Rai P, Kanase A.
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov 18; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
    Brettin BT, Grosland NM, Qian F, Southard KA, Stuntz TD, Morgan TA, Marshall SD, Southard TE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov 18; 134(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 18984394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The effect of rotation moment on the stability of immediately loaded orthodontic miniscrews: a pilot study.
    Cho YM, Cha JY, Hwang CJ.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec 18; 32(6):614-9. PubMed ID: 20466772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. An open system approach for surgical guide production.
    Abboud M, Orentlicher G.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec 18; 69(12):e519-24. PubMed ID: 22117708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Depth deviation and occurrence of early surgical complications or unexpected events using a single stereolithographic surgi-guide.
    Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Giansanti M, Di Mambro A, Calasso S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec 18; 40(12):1377-87. PubMed ID: 22001378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Assessment of stability of orthodontic mini-implants under orthodontic loading: A computed tomography study.
    Garg KK, Gupta M.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015 Dec 18; 26(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 26275187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Manufacturing splints for orthognathic surgery using a three-dimensional printer.
    Metzger MC, Hohlweg-Majert B, Schwarz U, Teschner M, Hammer B, Schmelzeisen R.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb 18; 105(2):e1-7. PubMed ID: 18230371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Root perforation associated with the use of a miniscrew implant used for orthodontic anchorage: a case report.
    McCabe P, Kavanagh C.
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jul 18; 45(7):678-88. PubMed ID: 22309739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning.
    Swennen GR, Mollemans W, De Clercq C, Abeloos J, Lamoral P, Lippens F, Neyt N, Casselman J, Schutyser F.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar 18; 20(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19276829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
    Al-Harbi SA, Sun AY.
    Implant Dent; 2009 Feb 18; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. AUSOM: a 3D placement guide for orthodontic mini-implants.
    Al-Suleiman M, Shehadah M.
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011 Feb 18; 12(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 21789288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Histomorphometric evaluation of cortical bone thickness surrounding miniscrew for orthodontic anchorage.
    Deguchi T, Yabuuchi T, Hasegawa M, Garetto LP, Roberts WE, Takano-Yamamoto T.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Sep 18; 13(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 19438949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Miniscrews or palatal implants for skeletal anchorage in the maxilla: comparative aspects for decision making.
    Wehrbein H, Göllner P.
    World J Orthod; 2008 Sep 18; 9(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 18426107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.