These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

219 related items for PubMed ID: 21844045

  • 21. A comparison of global conservation prioritization models with spatial spending patterns of conservation nongovernmental organizations.
    Holmes G, Scholfield K, Brockington D.
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Aug; 26(4):602-9. PubMed ID: 22809351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection.
    Armsworth PR, Jackson HB, Cho SH, Clark M, Fargione JE, Iacona GD, Kim T, Larson ER, Minney T, Sutton NA.
    Nat Commun; 2017 Dec 21; 8(1):2253. PubMed ID: 29269829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The role of trade-offs in biodiversity conservation planning: linking local management, regional planning and global conservation efforts.
    Faith DP, Walker PA.
    J Biosci; 2002 Jul 21; 27(4 Suppl 2):393-407. PubMed ID: 12177537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Prioritizing global conservation efforts.
    Wilson KA, McBride MF, Bode M, Possingham HP.
    Nature; 2006 Mar 16; 440(7082):337-40. PubMed ID: 16541073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Integrating economic costs and biological traits into global conservation priorities for carnivores.
    Loyola RD, Oliveira-Santos LG, Almeida-Neto M, Nogueira DM, Kubota U, Diniz-Filho JA, Lewinsohn TM.
    PLoS One; 2009 Aug 27; 4(8):e6807. PubMed ID: 19710911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Identification of marine and coastal biodiversity conservation priorities in Costa Rica].
    Alvarado JJ, Herrera B, Corrales L, Asch J, Paaby P.
    Rev Biol Trop; 2011 Jun 27; 59(2):829-42. PubMed ID: 21721241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Global priorities for national carnivore conservation under land use change.
    Di Minin E, Slotow R, Hunter LT, Montesino Pouzols F, Toivonen T, Verburg PH, Leader-Williams N, Petracca L, Moilanen A.
    Sci Rep; 2016 Apr 01; 6():23814. PubMed ID: 27034197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Benefits of integrating complementarity into priority threat management.
    Chadés I, Nicol S, van Leeuwen S, Walters B, Firn J, Reeson A, Martin TG, Carwardine J.
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr 01; 29(2):525-36. PubMed ID: 25362843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Conserving biodiversity efficiently: what to do, where, and when.
    Wilson KA, Underwood EC, Morrison SA, Klausmeyer KR, Murdoch WW, Reyers B, Wardell-Johnson G, Marquet PA, Rundel PW, McBride MF, Pressey RL, Bode M, Hoekstra JM, Andelman S, Looker M, Rondinini C, Kareiva P, Shaw MR, Possingham HP.
    PLoS Biol; 2007 Sep 01; 5(9):e223. PubMed ID: 17713985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Complementarity as a biodiversity indicator strategy.
    Reyers B, van Jaarsveld AS, Krüger M.
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Mar 07; 267(1442):505-13. PubMed ID: 10737409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Introducing Elinor for monitoring the governance and management of area-based conservation.
    Mahajan SL, Obiene S, Ojwang L, Olwero N, Valdivia A, Wosu A, Adrid E, Andradi-Brown DA, Andriamalala G, Ban NC, Bennett NJ, Blythe J, Cheng SH, Darling E, De Nardo M, Drury O'Neill E, Epstein G, Fidler RY, Fisher K, Geldmann J, Gill DA, Kroner RG, Gurney G, Jagadish A, Jonas HD, Lazuardi ME, Petersen S, Ranarivelo VV, Rasoloformanana L, Rasolozaka TM, Read DJ, Mwaiteleke ES, Ahmadia G.
    Conserv Biol; 2024 Apr 07; 38(2):e14213. PubMed ID: 37904666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Global conservation prioritization for the Orchidaceae.
    Vitt P, Taylor A, Rakosy D, Kreft H, Meyer A, Weigelt P, Knight TM.
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr 25; 13(1):6718. PubMed ID: 37185616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation.
    Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Dec 19; 103(51):19374-9. PubMed ID: 17164331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. A global mismatch in the protection of multiple marine biodiversity components and ecosystem services.
    Lindegren M, Holt BG, MacKenzie BR, Rahbek C.
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar 06; 8(1):4099. PubMed ID: 29511276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Large-scale conservation planning in a multinational marine environment: cost matters.
    Mazor T, Giakoumi S, Kark S, Possingham HP.
    Ecol Appl; 2014 Jul 06; 24(5):1115-30. PubMed ID: 25154100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. The grain of spatially referenced economic cost and biodiversity benefit data and the effectiveness of a cost targeting strategy.
    Sutton NJ, Armsworth PR.
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec 06; 28(6):1451-61. PubMed ID: 25381868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Setting priorities for regional conservation planning in the Mediterranean Sea.
    Micheli F, Levin N, Giakoumi S, Katsanevakis S, Abdulla A, Coll M, Fraschetti S, Kark S, Koutsoubas D, Mackelworth P, Maiorano L, Possingham HP.
    PLoS One; 2013 Dec 06; 8(4):e59038. PubMed ID: 23577060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Successful conservation of global waterbird populations depends on effective governance.
    Amano T, Székely T, Sandel B, Nagy S, Mundkur T, Langendoen T, Blanco D, Soykan CU, Sutherland WJ.
    Nature; 2018 Jan 11; 553(7687):199-202. PubMed ID: 29258291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.